Pastoral 2017: corrections & compliment; old Ohio Synod request; #4 conclusion

[2025-04-05: added links to Internet Archive below; 2017-03-04 & 03-08: added text in red below]
      This concludes from Part 3 of the series of blog posts related to the new 2017 Concordia Publishing House edition of Walther's Pastoral Theology.   See Part 1 for Table of Contents.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

      There is common terminology used by today's LC-MS teachers and leaders when speaking about Walther which is typified by the following statement of Editor David Loy in his Introduction, p. xv (bolding mine):

"The present work shows the fruits of his labors. In it, he applies Lutheran theology for nineteenth-century Lutheran pastors conducting their ministries in the United States."

One could assume that Prof. David W. Loy (of Philosophy) does not mean to limit Walther's theology to only the 19th century, and indeed he includes a section entitled "Why Read Walther's Pastoral Theology Today?" (p. xvi).  In this section Loy makes the following admirable statement:

...many issues Walther addresses continue to face Lutheran pastors in the twenty-first century, and for many of these issues, Lutheran doctrine establishes fairly specific boundaries for practice that are valid across historical contexts.

Loy's words here are hard to find fault with.  Yet even as he defends several areas where Walther's doctrine and practice are still valid, he also explicitly denies other areas due to "historical circumstances".  Either in his Introduction or his own footnotes, he denies Walther on Usury (p. 176 n. 5), and Life Insurance (p. 348 n 1).  Also translator Christian Tiews calls Walther's admonition against modern Dance "humorous" ("Translator's Notes", p. xx n. 3; p. 122). I have previously blogged on all of these topics and will leave them for the reader to use the hyperlinks to each of these matters to get Walther's (and Pieper's) biblical, evangelical teaching.  But there is one matter that Loy raises that I have not blogged on before because it is so obvious from the Bible itself.

A “New Challenge”?

      Editor David Loy, in his Introduction (p. xix) speaks of “new challenges we face” today and includes among these challenges “homoerotic behavior”.  It is implied that “homoerotic behavior” was not a “challenge” in the 19th century.  But the Bible speaks quite clearly on the matter of “homoerotic behavior” and is to be handled like all sexual sin.  How do I know that the Bible speaks clearly and is not ambiguous?  One does not find this specific subject handled in Walther’s Pastoral Theology.  But why?  Now what would Walther say today about this subject?  Here is one way that he might address this matter with Editor (philosopher?) David Loy:  it can be answered by the widely known homosexual Episcopal Bishop Gene Robinson (retired) who said (IndyStar / Journal & Courier, October 28, 2013; text file here):

Bishop Gene Robinson (2013)

“When discussing Bible Scripture that states ‘man shall not lie with man, as with a woman,’ Robinson said the text seems pretty clear.” — Bishop Gene Robinson @ Purdue University October 28, 2013

Yes, I say to you Editor David Loy: listen to Bishop Gene Robinson for he says “the text seems pretty clear”.  And he should know.  Would you now try to refute Bishop Robinson and say that the text isn’t clear?  But if the text is clear, then Walther gives clear Christian counsel for someone troubled with a particular sin, for example on your page 338 (see right, or here) where he uses Law (“in calm seriousness”), then “the riches of the free, divine grace and mercy in Christ, despite the exorbitance of their sins, according to Romans 5:20”. Sound familiar?  Just because the world around us has lost all sense of "natural law" does not mean that God's Word has changed in the slightest.  —

Carl S. Meyer
"Walther was:
haughty, proud, inconsiderate, Donatist,
quaint exegete, pietist, 
not wholly Christocentic, 
biblicist"

To:  Professor David W. Loy
   If you should think that I am being overly harsh with you, I must say that I am pleased that you did not say that Walther "could be haughty, proud, and at times even inconsiderate", you did not say that Walther came "close to Donatism", you did not say Walther verged on Pietism, you did not say Walther's exegesis was "quaint", you did not say Walther was "not wholly Christocentric", you did not say Walther was strongly "biblicistic", as the Director of Concordia Seminary School for Graduate Studies and great "historian" of the LC-MS Carl S. Meyer did say in his book Walther Speaks to the Church, [2025-04-05 added:] pgs. 10, 11, 62, 65, 90 (pgs 10-11, 62, 65, 90), in his essay in CTM 1972 vol 43, p. 262 (also here), and as reported in CTM 1973, vol. 44, #3, p. 163 (also here). — Now Prof. Loy, do not be surprised that your association with the name of “Walther” wins you no true spiritual friends among teachers and leaders of the LC-MS (but maybe enemies?), notwithstanding a few endorsements (and cheerleading).  Certainly the 1960-69 director of Concordia Seminary Graduate Studies would look askance at you for not joining with his judgments. (You might ask Dr. Robert Kolb if his judgments match those of Meyer's. (See also Berthold von Schenk.)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

To President Matthew Harrison:

      I was glad to see that CTS-FW President Prof. Lawrence Rast added his name to the endorsements!  But where is the endorsement by the other seminary president Prof. Dale Meyer?...  the well-known Dr. Robert Kolb?...  chairman of the practical theology department Prof. David J. Peter?...  Prof. Jeffrey Kloha (you and he both endorse Sasse)?...   Prof. Cameron MacKenzie?...  and what about the Robert D. Preus Associate Professor of Systematic Theology, Prof. Roland Ziegler, who helped you translate your At Home in the House of My Fathers?  Ziegler wrote a complementary essay on Walther's theology for the 2011 anniversary in the CTQ... would not his endorsement be helpful?   —  Now, President Harrison, show how important Walther's Works really are to you and your LC-MS – have Walther's Licht des Lebens sermon book translated and published.  Better yet, have Walther's Epistel Postille sermon books published for they have already been translated!  And here is a key item that cries out for the light of day for our “here and now” times – Walther's Foreword to the 1886 Lehre und Wehre on the Inspiration of Scripture.  Just ask Dr. Thomas Manteufel how important this doctrine was for Walther.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

      I want to end this limited commentary with a most interesting book announcement given for the original German edition of Walther's book that I ran across many years ago as I was ravaging through all things related to “old Missouri”.  It is surprisingly from the old Ohio Synod (forerunner of today's ELCA), Columbus Ohio. (The first edition of Walther's book was apparently in 1872, 2nd edition in 1875. PDF copy of announcement here). Bolding is mine:

“American Lutheran Pastoral Theology.”
(from the Lutheran Standard of the Ohio Synod, early 1873)

     A book with this title has been issued from the press of the Missouri Synod at St. Louis. It is written by Rev. Prof. C. F. W. Walther, which is a sufficient voucher for its ability and thoroughness. But we would perform a service especially to our ministerial brethren by calling particular attention to the work. No Lutheran minister, who is at all able to read the German, should deprive himself of the aid which its rich materials will furnish him in understanding the duties of his high calling and in directing him in the way of their proper performance.

     The word American in the title may suggest to some minds the un-Lutheran doctrine and practice in vogue among so-called Lutherans of the General Synod, who are especially fond of calling themselves American Lutherans. It is used in no such sectarian sense in this book, which is a Lutheran Pastoral Theology. The author says in his preface: “That the predicate American Lutheran is used will require no apology, as the choice of the pastoral theological materials was determined by the wants of the American Lutheran pastor.” It is this feature that gives it peculiar value for our ministers, cause for profound gratitude to God that such a Pastoral Theology should he given to the American Lutheran Church.

     It would extend our notice to too great a length were we to give even a brief outline of the subjects treated in this admirable look. In its fifth paragraphs and numerous notes everything that properly comes within the compass of Pastoral Theology, and much that some writers would refer to a different branch of theological science, is amply discussed and set forth in that exhaustive manner which is character­istic of the old Lutheran theologians. It would seem that all the wealth of pastoral theology, laid up in many old volumes, to most of which but few of our ministers have access, is collected here into one great treasury. And this whoever will may obtain at the small cost of $2.25.

An alphabetical index of subjects is appended, which greatly enhances the value of the work as a book of reference, for which purpose it will frequently be called into requisition.

     The volume contains 445 octavo pages, and is printed on good paper and in clear type. It is for sale by the agent of the Missouri Synod, Mr. M. C. Barthel, corner of 7th and Lafayette Streets, St. Louis, Mo. It is a book which it is profitable even for those ministers to buy who must practice close economy to spare the amount which it costs.

     There is but one wish in regard to it that we would yet express. The book is German, and English ministers, though the number is not very large as yet who would be likely to use it, need it so much. Would that the blessing to the American Lutheran Church could be multiplied by its publication in the English language. 

What a glorious tribute to C.F.W. Walther's work by the old Ohio Synod! ... and with a heart-felt request attached.  (Apparently the old Ohio Synod would not agree with Carl S. Meyer's judgment of Walther.)  Indeed, Concordia Publishing House, Matthew Harrison, Christian Tiews, David Loy, and Benjamin Mayes, you may all take a bow now, for the great request of the Ohio Synod of 1873 has finally been fully completed!  You also did well in not only getting this fully translated, but also in retaining the full official name for this book:

American-Lutheran Pastoral Theology.

And that is what it is, the gold standard in “pastoral theology” (like the “golden Concordia” Triglotta), for our modern times, for the whole world of Christianity, as it is distinguished from the demise of Germany’s “scientific”, rationalistic, ego-based theology.  I am sure that Dr. John Drickamer would be glad for this book and would complement it by name were he still with us here on earth today.

Pastoral #3: Fritz's editions, unionism, deep fog; Mueller-Kraus edition

[2025-05-24: updated 3 links to Fendt's book; 2017-09-26: updated 2 photos]
      This continues from Part 2 in a series of blog posts related to the new 2017 Concordia Publishing House edition of Walther's Pastoral Theology.   See Part 1 for Table of Contents.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Prof. J.H.C. Fritz

      As mentioned in Part 1, the 2 editions of Pastoral Theology authored by Prof. J.H.C. Fritz (1932 and 1945) were not mentioned in the new 2017 edition of Walther's work. The Fort Wayne seminary bookstore used to sell copies of the 1932 Fritz edition – I purchased one in the 1990s. But I see that it is not shown as available any more (but call them). I decided to include Fritz's editions in my table of cross-references because they were the first ones published in English by Concordia Publishing House.  And they were the main source of pastoral theology to many in the intervening years.  There are some who are interested in the history of "pastoral theology" or "practical theology" in the LC-MS after it had transferred its main language from German to English.  I am one of the interested ones because I wanted to see where there were amendments or supplements to Walther's original.  I knew there had to be differences because the LC-MS gradually, steadily changed its teaching after the death of Franz Pieper in 1931.  And yet one will find that in the specific topics where Pieper referred to Walther's "Pastorale" in his Christliche Dogmatik, Prof. Fritz did not significantly deviate from Pieper or Walther -- my cross-reference table proved this to me.  But with some other topics, Fritz did deviate somewhat from "old Missouri".  

      It was not a straightforward task to compare Fritz's editions to Walther's original because he did not follow Walther's order.  Fritz says in his 1932 Preface:

“I did not limit myself to a literal translation of those portions which I took over from Walther's Pastoraltheologie; I rather reproduced the subject-matter either by a literal or by a free translation, inserting such thoughts as suggested themselves to me at the time of writing and as seemed necessary or desirable to add.”

An example of one of the "insertions" was on "Christian Stewardship" where he quoted extensively from one of Franz Pieper's convention essays (pp. 261-262, 266-267).  Indeed, Fritz informs us in his preface that he was indebted to "the sainted Dr. F. Pieper, under whom I studied Pastoral Theology while a student at Concordia Seminary".
       I spent considerable time cross-referencing to both of Fritz’s editions, even hyperlinking to copies of pages, so that true students of "pastoral theology" could see what the LC-MS used for many decades after it abandoned the German language.   I found that most of the points that Pieper highlighted in his Dogmatik were covered by Fritz.  Prof. J.H.C. Fritz’s work is perhaps most disappointing in that it only roughly follows Walther’s subject matter, excluding portions, adding to other portions -- topics not specifically addressed by Walther.  It was rather difficult to refer back to Walther’s work from either of Fritz’s works, 1932 or 1945.  This highlights one of the greatest benefits of the new 2017 edition which allows the reader to be exposed to the (mostly) complete pure Walther as he presented his material.  Another benefit is that there is no difficulty comparing the original German edition to this 2017 English edition as it even keys each page to the original page number – a very helpful feature!
      Now I want to address the one topic that reveals the downfall of the external Church in America in the Twentieth Century.  I will incorporate the story of two other professors of Concordia Seminary,  Prof. Fritz's associates, to fully illustrate this history:

Unionism

Unionism is one of the topics covered by Prof. Fritz that is not named specifically by Walther.  However Walther does speak clearly of church "fellowship" in several places in his book, leaving no doubt as to his teaching that condemns all forms of unionism.  (See also the 2014 CPH book Walther's Works: Church Fellowship.) -- In 1932, Fritz begins well with the following definition of unionism (p. 219):

“Joining in religious worship or in religious work or in both by such as are not in doctrinal agreement is religious unionism.”

Prof. W. Arndt

A few years later, in 1937, a close associate, Prof. William Arndt, showed similar firmness against unionism as he stated the following on the topic of prayer fellowship in his book Christian Prayer, p. 65 (quoted in Erlandsson Church Fellowship, p. 41):

"Whoever changes the teachings of Jesus thereby creates a division in the church and sets himself in opposition to all those who adhere to the doctrine of Christ. We have learned from St. Paul that we must avoid all such causes of division (Ro. 16:17). That naturally means that we can have no prayer fellowship with them."

Arndt: from "no prayer fellowship" to "Deep Fog"

But this firmness in doctrine and practice gradually broke down.  Through his extensive involvement in doctrinal discussions with the American Lutheran Church (ALC), in 1943 (CTM vol. 14, #11 November pp. 787-791), he came to write the essay "God Purposes To Justify Those That Have Come to Faith" which is an attempt to defend the ALC's statement of the same name.  Arndt admits (p. 787) that "Everybody can see that the sentence under discussion puts the creation of faith before the pronouncement of justification."  But compare this to Walther's words from Central District 1868: "…you often hear pastors preach, 'You are saved if you believe.' What they should be saying is, 'You are saved so that you might believe.'" Arndt here ignores Universal Justification and so his essay confuses the Lutheran Doctrine of Justification.  (See also this blog post on Arndt's error) Then in the summer of 1946, Prof. Arndt was again in the middle of further discussions with the ALC, and preceding official agreement, he said (Fendt, The Struggle for Lutheran Unity..., p. 79):

• 'In my opinion the meeting, if it is held, should be opened with joint prayer. A common document constituting a confession of faith has been drawn up by representatives of two church bodies, which document will be considered by both bodies when they meet in convention. If the representatives of these bodies cannot jointly ask for God's guidance when they meet, then I move in a deep fog as to the scope and meaning of joint prayer.

But there is no record of an opening prayer at the August 23, 1946 joint meeting. Evidently Dr. Arndt did not get enough support for that in his group.

How sad are these words of Prof. Arndt – "a deep fog".  But they fit the situation where one finds oneself departing from the clear Word of Holy Scripture.  Perhaps a modern word fits here – schizophrenia might be used.  I recall this same feeling for my own self when falling away from the Bible. —
      And we see that Prof. Fritz had just the year before, in the 1945 2nd edition of his Pastoral Theology, supplemented his 1932 1st edition definition of Unionism (highlighted, p. 211):

“Joining in religious worship or in religious work or in both by such as are not in doctrinal agreement, or, in other words, joint work or worship by which the truth is either denied or the appearance of denial, or at least of indifferentism, is given, is religious unionism.”

Th. Aaberg

The difference of wording has been identified by other members of the Synodical Conference as evidence of a change towards subjectivism in the LC-MS.  Theodore Aaberg of the ELS wrote in his book A City Set on a Hill, p. 158:

“Where previous to this, certain acts in themselves had been called unionistic, now it was not the act itself which constituted unionism, but whether or not it was done in such a way as to imply denial of truth or support of error.  This new definition of unionism found its way into an important publication of the Missouri Synod, Pastoral Theology, by John H. C. Fritz...”

Fritz to Graebner: Retract! 

Prof. Th. Graebner

"false picture"

I had originally thought that this judgement by Aaberg against Fritz may have been overly harsh.  Edward C. Fendt reported (Struggle, p. 82-83) the following incident in 1947 involving Profs. Fritz and Theo. Graebner which shows Fritz's desire to stand firm, even in the face of heavy unionistic pressure from a prominent associate:

When the Missouri Synod Committee on Doctrinal Unity met on May 8, 1947 the following entry in the minutes appears right after the opening prayer and statement of the purpose of the meeting by the chairman, Dr. Fritz:

• "A letter written by Dr. Graebner, in which he accuses our Committee of presenting a false picture on current relations with the ALC was read by Prof. Baepler. It was resolved to request Dr. G[raebner]. to retract this accusation in a letter to us and to his correspondents" (neither Dr. Behnken nor Dr. Arndt was present when this action was taken). 

Dr. Graebner did not retract.

We see that Prof. Fritz endured strong pressure from Graebner toward unionism and wanted this letter to be retracted.

Fritz's new definition ==> "Common Confession"

Unfortunately this firmness in the face of such intimidating unionism began to weaken and fall for it was Prof. J.H.C. Fritz who was the leading teacher from the Missouri Synod who in 1949 drafted the infamous "Common Confession" with men from the ALC.  For a penetrating analysis of the history surrounding this document, see Aaberg, p. 172-177; also see Wendland, Review of Common Confession [added 2017-03-05], Fendt, p. 136-138.  So we see the tragic consequences of Fritz's revision in  the 1945 definition of "unionism" which paved the subjective road to ruin.

      Further comments on Fritz's work are beyond the scope of this blog.  It is sad for me to again review the steps of the downfall of the old Missouri Synod to today's modernist, heterodox LC-MS.  But I view Prof. J.H.C. Fritz's Pastoral Theology books as not completely denying his teacher, Franz Pieper, or Walther's work.

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

Pastoral Theology (1990)
by Mueller and Kraus

      There was another book of "pastoral theology" put out by Concordia Publishing that escaped my notice until now, the 1990 (and 1996) editions of Pastoral Theology of Norbert Mueller and George Kraus.  I am sorry that I did not include it in my cross-reference table.  I suspect it has been the required reading for all LC-MS students of theology since its introduction.  Even the ELS bookstore sells this book!  (Why isn't the ELS in church fellowship with the LC-MS?)  I think I investigated this book 20 years ago and gave up on the LC-MS.  For my part, the work of Mueller and Kraus has little promise of shedding the errors of the modernist, heterodox LC-MS – otherwise Matthew Harrison and John T. Pless would not be so visibly promoting the new 2017 edition of Walther's work!

Pastorskoe bogoslovie
(Russian Pastoral Theology)

This book was also translated into Russian by the Lutheran Heritage Foundation in 1999 (search "Pastoral Theology" and Language="Russian").  This is a different version than the Drickamer 1995 edition... and certainly not nearly as faithful in doctrine and practice.  I wonder that the Russian Lutherans may already know the difference...

.
.
.
In the last Part 4, I comment further on the new 2017 edition of Walther's work.  At least 2 topics show a distinct change in the LC-MS from its former pure teaching of Bible truths.

Pastoral 2017: criticism or honor for Drickamer? #2

      This continues from Part 1 in a series of blog posts related to the new 2017 Concordia Publishing House edition of Walther's Pastoral Theology. See Part 1 for Table of Contents.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

       There is an elitism in the LCMS today associated with the 2017 edition. No one – not Harrison, not editor David Loy, not translator Christian Tiews, not any of the CPH endorsers – no one in the book itself ever directly mentions or praises the prior 1995 abridged translation made by Dr. John M. Drickamer († 1999?).  Translator Tiews condescendingly speaks of it as “highly abridged and only covers one third of Walther’s original book”.  My chart shows that Drickamer’s edition included practically all of the core teachings of Walther.  All of Walther's 50 sections are included, more or less, and in the exact same order that Walther presents them. (Note to President Harrison: I heartily thanked God for the 1995 edition when it came out!... even as I thank Him for this 2017 edition.)  If all these people are so glad for their full translation, then why is there no honor for the one who gave us at least the abridged (not supplemented) version over 20 years ago?  Was it not important to have the essentials that Drickamer brought to the world two decades ago? (It was a life-line for me.) Oh, I too strongly desired that Drickamer had provided the full content of Walther's book, but he did not have the resources of Concordia Publishing House with the help of its editors!  No, he had to find someone else and went to Pastor Herman Otten’s publishing house (Lutheran News / Christian News) which does not have those resources, but at least Otten took this project on. More on this below. —
So I will give the honor to Dr. John Drickamer that should have been given to him in the 2017 edition!  Drickamer was a scholar in the German language – I believe a first rate scholar.  He hosted an online German language lesson series (Drueckhammer's Deutsch Academie) for “those who wished to read the Lutheran Confessions in their original language (clergy and laity)” on the CAT41.org website – now apparently defunct. This website reported that Drickhamer had a “Th.D. in Ecclesiastical History” and was “a past professor of both theology and the German Language”.   I even wonder that he may have been more qualified as a translator than Rev. Christian Tiews.  Shame on Harrison and Pless for not acknowledging this fruitful work of Dr. Drickhamer!  And because of this, I think those truly interested in Walther’s “Pastoral Theology” will still be interested in purchasing Drickamer’s book to compare translations, and still have an abridged version, or for those wanting a quicker read or even a cheaper copy (currently only $9 + shipping).

Comments on Prof. Pless’s Facebook page per CN Feb. 13, 2017 p. 9:

Steven Anderson: “I have the Drickamer/CN edition.  That will have to suffice.”  –

Lincoln Winter: “I know that Drickamer leaves out a lot.  But is the translation significantly inferior to the new one?  Tight budget these days means there needs to be significant weakness to make me buy a second copy of a book I already have.  Anywhere we can see examples of some improvements?  Otherwise, I will have to stick with the ‘Can’t Won’t’ edition.” - Feb. 2 at 7:30 am;

Note to Lincoln Winter: My cross-reference table in Part 1 will help you to compare these editions for yourself.  Drickamer included at least the core information for ALL chapters of Walther’s work, in the order that Walther presented them.  You will see that contrary to the “one third” notion of some, Drickamer’s edition is more than this.  Although I disagree with Matthew Harrison’s “Can’t Won’t” opinion, yet I would say that whenever another sale comes up, you should purchase the full 2017 edition, for this work of Walther is so important, especially if you are considering the office of ministry.  If all you want is the basics of Walther’s teaching, or an “easy read”, then Drickamer’s edition can be used.

Now I present the following reprint of the author’s biography from page 301 of Drickamer/CN 1995 translation of Walther’s Pastoral Theology.  I was glad to see that Pastor Otten did the same thing on his February 13 issue of Christian News, page 8:

————————————

Dr. John M. Drickamer

      John M. Drickamer, a lifelong Lutheran, was raised in the suburbs of Cleveland,Ohio. He was educated at Lutheran parochial schools through the eighth grade. In 1971 he received the B.A. degree from Capital University, with majors in philosophy, history, and ancient languages. His seminary education was at Concordia Theological Seminary, Springfield, Illinois (now located at Fort Wayne, Indiana), from which he received the M. Div. degree in 1975. His vicarage was at Zion Lutheran Church, Chamberlain, South Dakota, in 1973 and 1974.  

      In 1978 Drickamer received the Th.D. degree from Concordia Seminary, St. Louis, majoring in historical theology. From 1977 to 1980 he taught courses in theology and religious history at Concordia College, Ann Arbor, Michigan. From 1980 to 1986 he was pastor of Immanuel Lutheran Church, Georgetown, Ontario, Canada, and also taught theology at Concordia Lutheran Theological Seminary in St. Catharines, Ontario. Since returning to the United States he has served churches in Illinois, Kansas and Oregon.

     Drickamer has published over nine hundred items, including books, poems, hymns, translations, scripts, sermons and short stories.

—————————————

$8.99 + shipping

      Herman Otten exposes the duplicity of both Harrison and Pless (and today's LCMS) when he gives the “rest of the story” of the history of Drickamer's edition, CN 2017-02-13 p. 8:

“Drickamer suggested that CN ask the Schwan Foundation for the $10,000 CPH said it would pay Drickamer for his translation.  This foundation, according to Drickamer, had agreed to give CPH $10,000 for his work in producing the translation.  CN would then turn the $10,000 over to Drickamer.  When CN asked the Schwan Foundation for the $10,000 to publish Drickamer's translation of Walther's Pastoral, the foundation declined, claiming there was no real interest in Walther's work.  When CN became involved with the translation, the Schwan Foundation was no longer interested in it.  Years later the Schwan Foundation financed a Russian translation of Drickamer's translation by the Lutheran Heritage Foundation [search Language="Russian", Title="Pastoral Theology"; WorldCat here], since is was much easier to understand and helpful today than a translation of Walther's entire volume with all of its footnotes.  CN granted the Lutheran Heritage Foundation permission to publish Drickamer's translation in Russian without charge.”

According to Otten's report, it appears that Concordia Publishing House backed out of a commitment to pay Dr. John Drickamer $10,000 for his translation.  (Note to Concordia Publishing House: Is this true?) —  Otten then rightfully reprinted the glowing endorsements of Drickamer's edition by CHI director August Suelflow and CTS-FW President Robert Preus. (Aren't Harrison and Pless also condemning Robert Preus and August Suelflow?) —  Pastor Otten should reveal all the details he can gather on Drickamer showing all his publications and scholarly experience.  Otten should research and reveal all the details that he can scrounge up regarding the "unfortunate things" that happened to him as a result of his bold proclamation of the Word of God.
The old CAT41.org website reported the fate of Dr. Drickamer (from Wayback Machine, emphases mine):

“Due to Dr. Drickamer's experience of the unfortunate things that so often are done to those who boldly proclaim the Word of God as the Lutheran Confessions rightly set it forth, these lessons were forced to take a hiatus when Dr. Drickamer was no longer able to afford to stay electronically connected to us. Due to his untimely (to us; timely to his Lord and, thus, blessed to Dr. Drickamer) death, these lessons stopped completely.”

I emphasize 2 points from the above quote:

1. "What were these "unfortunate things" that happened to Dr. Drickamer because of his bold proclamation of the “Word of God as the Lutheran Confessions rightly set it forth”? Could it have been reprisals against him from the LCMS? The website does not specify.  
2. Note to Concordia Publishing House:  By this account, Dr. Drickamer was not a rich man… he could not afford to “stay electronically connected”.  Could that be because you squeezed him out of a promised payment of $10,000 for his 1995 edition? … and so he was forced to go elsewhere, eventually to Pastor Herman Otten and his Lutheran News publishing?  And could it be that Otten’s report of the Schwan Foundation’s comment, that

“...there was no real interest in Walther's work”

actually came from you, CPH?  Could it be that all this criticism of Drickamer’s edition is in reality a coverup for your (and today’s LCMS) shameful treatment of Dr. John Drickamer?  Could it be that all the cheerleading for the new 2017 edition and criticism of Dr. John Drickamer’s edition are in reality a duplicitous endeavor?

The Woman Who Cared
by Dr. John M. Drickamer

      Oh, and what are we reminded of?... that Dr. Drickamer was published also by Northwestern Publishing House.  He had 3 books published by them (no longer available from them, but see Amazon).  See the attached picture of one of those publications, the one that I have kept for over 20 years, and not discarded.  The proper thing for Northwestern to do now would be to defend Dr. Drickamer against these unwarranted attacks by today's LC-MS leaders.  

   Oops!  There he is – Dr. Drickamer's book of translation of other works of Walther is still being sold by CPH!  Drickamer is the translator for their Print-On-Demand book Selected Writings of C.F.W. Walther - Walther on the Church. (Why now Print-On-Demand only?)  On the dust jacket of the original 1981 hardback edition, it says this of Dr. Drickamer: “John M. Drickamer, Th.D., a parish pastor at Immanuel Lutheran Church, Georgetown, Ont., Canada, also served as a religion instructor at Concordia Lutheran College, Ann Arbor, Mich.”  And in the Translator's Preface, Drickamer wrote this: 

“The translation in this volume makes use of Dr. Mueller's work. His translations have been exhaustively compared with the original German, and numerous revisions have been made.”

This comment clearly shows not only the scholarly translation capability of Dr. Drickamer, but also his scrupulous intent to keep the precise meaning of Walther where even Prof. J.T. Mueller may have strayed too far.  I even wonder that if Drickamer was not hampered by CPH's "space limitations" in 1981, that he could have given a full translation of Walther's Church and Ministry back then, better than Matthew Harrison's The Church and The Office of The Ministry of 2012!  —  Hmmm... aren't these LC-MS leaders who criticize Drickamer's translation work hurting one of Concordia Publishing's own books that is actively sold now?  It would seem so.
      Although I may not be the best judge of translation quality, I wonder that Christian Tiews and/or editor David Loy would not be so ready to harshly criticize and say that Drickamer's “translation is inadequate” as Prof. Pless does.  How about it Pastor Christian Tiews?... Prof. David Loy?... Prof. Benjamin Mayes?

But Thanks Be To God!... that this duplicitous behavior by today's LC-MS did not greatly hamper this edition.  To all those students of theology wondering whether they should purchase this edition if they already have the Drickamer edition –by all means they should make a concerted effort to do so.  All parents and supporters of students of theology should gift this book to their students!  Why?  Because it is the complete work of … C.F.W. Walther, and Thank God!...  that in spite of the very real hatred of Walther in today’s LC-MS, this edition has seen the light of day.  (Has anybody seen any endorsement by Profs. Herrmann or Kloha for this new 2017 edition?)
And if they continue to criticize Drickamer’s “abridgment”, then they are condemning themselves for Concordia Publishing House has for decades enforced "space limitations" on translation projects of Walther's works. In the 1981 edition of Selected Writings of C.F.W. Walther - Law and Gospel, p. 10, translator Bouman wrote:

“The current work represents a considerable abridgment and condensation of the original.  Many of Walther's extensive citations from Luther and other authors were either reduced to their essential point or deleted entirely.,  As a rule, ... much of Walther's running comment was condensed. These cuts in the material were dictated by the publisher's space limitations.”

The reader should not wait too many years to purchase this book because it will likely fall into disuse in today’s LC-MS – may God prevent it! – for even now CPH has discontinued the complete set of Pieper’s Christian Dogmatics, primarily because they have abandoned the index volume (or volume 4).  You can no longer purchase a new copy of this book as of 2016.  CTS-FW President Rast earlier promised that “At Concordia Theological Seminary in Fort Wayne, there is no intention of 'doing away with' Pieper.” That may still be so (I hope), but new students will likely go without the Index. The index volume was a tremendous aid in searching out subject matter in “Walther’s Dogmatics”, i.e. Franz Pieper’s Christliche Dogmatik (Christian Dogmatics).

      All those who have had good experience with Dr. John Drickamer and/or his works should now come forth and point out just how good a scholar and Christian teacher he was.  How about it, Northwestern Publishing House (WELS), Lutheran Synod Book Co. (ELS),  Lutheran Heritage Foundation, etc, the pastors of the old CAT41 organization (Confess and Teach for Unity), etc. I know he was a good teacher for I benefited from his writings as I returned to the Christian faith.  And even though I rebuked Drickamer by letter for some weakness that he had in defending Universal, Objective Justification, his response gave me full assurance that he had not fallen away but was only a little confused in terminology.  How sad I was when I learned of his untimely passing... but also glad for his good confession of faith.  

      Thank God!... for Dr. John Drickamer and his translation of Walther's Pastoral Theology!  I hope Pastor Otten or Timothy Otten reveal even more details of the sorry treatment of Drickamer at the hands of the LC-MS.  And although I thank God for the 2017 CPH edition, I cannot do this with President Matthew Harrison!  (Note to Harrison: now publish Prof. Jeffrey Kloha's glowing endorsement of Walther's work!  You know, the same glowing endorsement that both you and he give to Hermann Sasse's works, here and here)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

      In the next Part 3, I discuss the works of Prof. J.H.C. Fritz, the first English language Pastoral Theology books published by CPH.

Dogmatik keyed to Walther's Pastoral Theology, #1 (Pless: shallow pastoral theology); Part A: series on CD refs

[2017-04-02: added Table of Contents below for series on References in Christliche Dogmatik]
      This is Part 1 in a series of blog posts related to the new 2017 Concordia Publishing House edition of Walther's Pastoral Theology.  See bottom of this blog post for the current Table of Contents to this series. [Note: this is also Part A of a series on Christliche Dogmatik references to Old Missouri -- Part A. See Table of Contents at bottom of this post.]

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

       I have been pressed to present the following cross-reference table due to published attacks by LCMS leaders on both Dr. John Drickamer's edition of Walther's Pastoral Theology and its publisher Pastor Herman Otten's Lutheran New/Christian News.  This has been occasioned by the release of the new 2017 edition.  These attacks are reported by Pastor Otten in his February 13, 2017 issue of Christian News newspaper and are most shameful.  This blog has rebuked Pastor Otten in past blog posts, especially regarding the Doctrine of Justification.  But some of his defenses against the errors of Prof. Jeffrey Kloha on the Doctrine of Scripture have been appreciated!  And now an attack by Prof. John T. Pless on Dr. Drickamer's edition is rather ironic, as Pless would use Wilhelm Loehe as a "corrective to Walther's understanding of the office (of Ministry)".

———————————————

      Before I comment further, I present below a table of the complete listing of all of Franz Pieper's numerous references to Walther's Pastoraltheologie in the 3 volumes of his Christliche Dogmatik / Christian Dogmatics. Pieper made heavy use of Walther in his Dogmatics as I stated in an earlier blog. The English edition of Pieper was, and is, perhaps the best way to learn the pastoral theology of C.F.W. Walther. And with the release of the 2017 full translation of Walther's work, I wanted to fully cross-reference it to Pieper's great work.  But this table cross references to not only the German edition and the new English 2017 edition, it is also keyed to the three intervening versions.  These include the 2 versions of Prof. J.H.C. Fritz published by Concordia in 1932 and 1945, and Dr. John Drickamer's 1995 edition.  The introduction to CPH's latest publishing strangely makes no mention of Fritz's editions.  These were the only versions available up until 1995 when Drickamer's translation appeared.  Fritz's editions were helpful, especially for the newly transformed LCMS as it dropped its German language heritage.  But I have also found them less satisfying than the original by Walther, for Walther is more capable of speaking to the heart.  Indeed I consider Fritz's editions somewhat inferior as Fritz gave only a marginal amount of direct translation and paraphrasing of Walther's original German.   I will comment further on these later. — Now I present a cross-reference table between Pieper and Walther with hyperlinks to all but the copyrighted editions of Pastoral Theology.  Now the reader will be enabled by a simple click to directly access these other works.  I have even included links to the English edition of Pieper's Dogmatics through the "snippet" view in Google Books (unless CPH prevents this later).

Christian Dogmatics  ===>>>  1897 German  —––– 1932 Fritz ––—–— 1945 Fritz ——– 1995 Drickamer ——— 2017 CPH

(This document may be accessed directly >> here <<.)

(This document may be accessed directly >> here <<.)

An added benefit of this table is the last column of brief notes for quick reference on each line's subject matter.  These notes makes it useful to track down specific topics, e.g. "Law & Gospel" or "Absolution". —  If one scrolls down the above table to volume 3 of Pieper's Dogmatik, (3:307n1047), I make note of what appears to be an inadvertent error of omission in the CPH 2017 edition. It seems that 2 footnotes in the German language edition p. 111 are missing (marked * and **).  I was surprised to find these as this work appears to be well done for completeness.  But I wonder how many other errors there may be in this edition... perhaps few if any.

————————————————————

Prof. John T. Pless

      But to comment further, it was reported in Pastor Otten's Christian News of Feb. 13 p. 9 that Prof. Pless stated the following on his Facebook page:

"The CN edition [Drickamer's] is a very poor substitute. The translation is inadequate and significant sections are omitted.  Get the new edition." – John T. Pless

If Prof. Pless was truly interested in the wealth of Walther's teaching to be made available, he would have rather complimented Drickamer... he would have rather spearheaded the effort for the full translation many years ago!  I want to repeat Prof. Pless's words of “celebration” of Walther in 2011 (emphases mine):

“... Löhe's legacy have been retrieved in LCMS efforts to broaden ecumenical perspective, deepen pastoral theology, enrich liturgical life, give shape to an authentically Lutheran missiology, enhance the place of the female diaconate, sustain the church's corporate life of mercy, or to provide what is seen as a corrective to Walther's understanding of the office” –  John T. Pless

These are Prof. Pless's own words to “celebrate” Walther.  It should be noted that Pless also stated that this new CPH 2017 edition will be “required text for my Advanced Pastoral Theology class.”  With the above quote from 2011, it is a foregone conclusion that Prof. Pless will require other textbooks than Walther's book as a “corrective” to it.  According to Pless, Walther had a flat ecumenical perspective, shallow pastoral theology, poor liturgical life, flat Lutheran missiology, lack of giving place to female diaconates, unsustained corporate life of mercy, and flawed understanding of the office of ministry!  Which does the reader think Prof. Pless prefers in matters of “pastoral theology”: Wilhelm Loehe or C.F.W. Walther? And why would Prof. Pless now on his Facebook page proclaim that Walther's Pastoral Theology will be required for his students?  Could it not be to target Walther's weaknesses needing the “corrective” of Loehe?  Could it possibly be to cover his judgments of Walther with a facade of respect? — Pless and his defenders may plead that my criticism goes too far.  Let them, for Pless's own words condemn himself.
      Now see, Prof. Pless, I did not put my blog's name in the above cross-reference table so that you can have your students link directly to the Google Doc for your "Advanced Pastoral Theology" class without fear of promoting this blog.  But sorry, I did not cross-reference Walther's Pastoral Theology to any of Loehe's works.  You will have to do that yourself in order to "deepen" Walther's pastoral theology.

      In the next Part 2, the shameful treatment of Dr. Drickamer is brought out with more details.  Even Pastor Otten's defense of Drickamer could have been stronger...
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -  Table of Contents  on Pastoral Theology - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Part 1 - Introduction; Table of Cross-references; Prof. Pless's criticisms of Drickamer &Walther
Part 2 - Defense of Dr. John Drickamer and his 1995 translated edition (still useful!)
Part 3 - Prof. J.H.C. Fritz's 1932 & 1945 editions & unionsm; also 1990 Mueller-Kraus edition
Part 4 - Corrections for new 2017 CPH edition; C.S. Meyer's judgment of Walther; old Ohio Synod request

Added 2017-04-02:
= = = = = = =   Table of Contents on Christliche Dogmatik References to Old Missouri   = = = = = = = =
Part A – this post -- Walther's Pastoral Theology
Part B – Lehre und Wehre - Walther's essays and other essays
Part C – Der Lutheraner articles (including DL Table of Contents)
Part D – Convention essays: old Missouri Synod, Synodical Conference
Part E – Walther's books, old Missouri books (Kirche und Amt, etc.) and lectures: Stoeckhardt books
Part F – Baier-Walther Compendium Theologiae Positivae

Pieper's Dogmatics set/index no longer sold by CPH

[2017-12-28: update – CPH now offers a "Print on Demand" version for $40, a better deal than their Kindle version.]
      It has come to my attention that Concordia Publishing House is no longer selling the full set of Franz Pieper's Christian Dogmatics.  Their website currently says

Availability: We no longer carry this product.

This was a bit of a surprise to me as I thought there were seminary courses which might still require getting the full set of this basic Dogmatics work.  According to the Wayback Machine, their last record of this item still showing availability was last April, 2016.  The last price shown on Wayback a year ago was $139.99.  (Thankfully the other 3 volumes are still being sold individually by CPH.)

      Then when one attempts to find out if the Index volume, or volume 4, is still available, one is met with the following web message:

"Whoops! Looks like something went wrong. The page may be temporarily unavailable or may no longer exist."

So the only way one may still purchase this book or the full set is through Amazon (here and here) which still lists both being available to some extent.  I see that Amazon still sells the Kindle version of the Index volume and that would certainly be an option for those preferring it.  But there are those who prefer the print version, and it is not just older persons who prefer print.   –  This index is a massive work (1025 pages!) providing quick access to specific subjects, persons and Scripture references across all 3 volumes of Pieper's magnum opus.  Dear God!... how precious this Index has been to me as I studied Pieper's work carefully.

      It seems to me that this abandonment is a good method for the LCMS to begin the final steps to quietly, slowly, inexorably, completely get rid of the old Missouri from its teaching.

      Ah, but President Harrison will protest my criticism... see my next blog series on the new CPH Walther book Pastoral Theology.

The Gospel is nothing more than… (Walther's Light of Life sermon book)

      About 15-20 years ago, I ran across a particularly comforting expression used by C.F.W. Walther in one of his yet untranslated sermon books, Licht des Lebens or Light of Life.  I made a note of this then for my future reference so that it would be remembered for as long as I live.  Now I want to publish a short paragraph from this sermon to the world.  On page 601, Walther presents exactly what the Gospel is, and I will take this to my grave (German text here, all emphasis is mine):

The Gospel is, therefore, really nothing more than a letter from God to the whole world in which he tells it that its sins are paid and forgiven; nothing other than a receipt, which is to be handed over to all sinners, which in it is written: God is paid-up by the death of his Son; the debts of all sinners are paid.

Licht des Lebens
(Light of Life)

      For the reader that would like to know more about this sermon book, or for anyone considering translating this book, there is a book review published in Lehre und Wehre, 1905 (vol. 51), pp. 508-510.  It was written by Prof. Friedrich Bente and focuses on another sermon (pages 302-309) from the same book that emphasizes the universal justification of the whole world.  But Bente approaches this subject from the angle of refuting the Ohio Synod and its rejection of this most beautiful of Christian doctrines.  I will leave to the reader the further work of loading this book review into a Chrome browser and automatically translating it.  This essay by Bente is similar to the great warning that Franz Pieper sounded out against the Ohio Synod in this earlier blog post.  In a nutshell, the refutation says, “It's not Calvinism, it's the Gospel”. — To repeat the glorious expression of Walther:

The Gospel is nothing more than a receipt!

Would you like your receipt?  It's been printed out for you...