Search This Blog

Wednesday, April 24, 2024

RH12: Walther’s lament - don’t be another United Church; Iowa-Ohio shamed by German pastor

   This continues from Part 11 (Table of Contents in Part 1) in a series presenting Pastor's Hochstetter's critique of an 1881 German pamphlet on the Old Missouri Synod. — We saw in the last segment that Pastor Hoffmann was "grabbing at straws" by attempting to quote Walther against Walther. Hochstetter untangles that web of a misquote and uses it for the instruction of his readers. Then the focus turns to the Missouri Synod itself, and its still living teacher, C. F. W. Walther. — From Lehre und Wehre, vol. 28 (Feb. 1882), pp. 81-82 [EN]: 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

How the Missouri Synod is Judged in Germany Today.

[A review of an 1881 pamphlet by Pastor Rudolph Hoffmann of Germany]

By Pastor Ch. Hochstetter, Stonebridge, Canada.


In this sense the tone of lamentation [p. 32-33] in the synodical address [by Walther] at the opening of the 1878 Delegate Synod [German text, English translation (DeepL)] is to be understood, which tone Hoffmann sees as a sign of the threatening decay of our Synod. Such warnings must sound, so that we do not arrive where the United Church has long been! Meanwhile, the Election of Grace controversy that erupted soon after that synodical session and is now drawing to a close has served to show that the Missouri Synod still holds fast to the true church unity described in Article VII of the Augsburg Confession

the voice of Missouri has not yet faded away

It is also clear from the respect with which Hoffmann writes of Missouri as a whole that the voice of the Missouri Synod has not yet faded away in Christendom. According to his writing, Hoffmann also knew about the present dispute, for he is surprised that we do not swear by the words of John Gerard in regard to the doctrine of the Election of Grace. Finally, however, he thinks that as long as the congregations bow to the Word of God, and "Walther's prudent hand" [p. 29] still holds the reins, the Missouri Synod may well remain, but it is understandable to say that the Missouri Synod sees only through two eyes, and if these close, Missouri will dissolve into general fragmentation. The latter fear is understandable in a man of the State Church, because such a man thinks that with the departure of that man another régime begins, in the manner of a change of ministers.  

Ohioans, Iowans…should be…ashamed by… this foreign stranger

On the whole, however, the writer of this, as often as Hoffmann's judgment on Walther confronts him (as it has already been mentioned earlier), thinks that the latest opponents (Ohioans, Iowans), who had just set their sights on Walther, should be somewhat ashamed by the testimony of this [German] foreign stranger [Hoffmann], who after his death still has to speak of the Missourian professor with such recognition.

F. A. Schmidt (Norwegian Synod), F. W. Stellhorn (Ohio Synod)

It seemed as if a Catilinian conspiracy was about to break out in the midst of the Synodical Conference, while younger men [Profs. F. A. Schmidt of Norwegian Synod, F. W. Stellhorn of Ohio Synod], who already hold important chairs, fired their arrows against their old teacher [Walther]; but the arrows did not hit, it seemed as if mountains wanted to give birth, it was said that the command for this dispute was from God, but behold, this work was not from God… what finally became of it? A point of defiance for some malcontent pastors, America will perhaps be enriched by a small synod! — 

the church of the Missourians…founded on the Word of God

As far as Hoffmann's fear is concerned, we well know that the eyes of everyone, even of a dear teacher, will close once in death, until the Day of Resurrection. But the eyes of the Lord are always open and they look at the righteous! [Psalm 34:15] That is, to those who hold on to the pure Word and are not lax in the work of the LORD! The external <page 82> Missouri synodical association can dissolve what is visible, what is passing away; but the church of the Missourians cannot fall, for it is the church of which Luther said that it was founded on the Word of God, and will be renewed by the Word of God; therefore, it will be preserved by the Word of God even in this last time of sorrow. Even the gates of hell will not overpower it. 

“For all flesh is as grass, and all the glory of man as the flower of grass. The grass withereth, and the flower thereof falleth away: but the word of the Lord endureth for ever.” [1 Peter 1:24-25]

- - - - - - - - - - -  Continued in Part 13  - - - - - - - - - - - -
      Pastor Christian Hochstetter's history may be criticized by today's LC-MS teachers, yet this criticism is evidently from the same point of view as from the German Pastor Rudolph Hoffmann who defended a hierarchical (state-run) church government against a government of "Christocracy". — Hoffmann's reference to Walther's 1878 Synod Address above was also used by a much more well-known German theologian, Georg Buchwald, in a pamphlet of 1886. More on that in a future blog series.
      There are several doctrines brought out by Pastor Hoffmann that Pastor Hochstetter passed over and did not respond to: chiefly the Antichrist. We address those in the next Part 13.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Comments only accepted when directly related to the post.