Search This Blog

Monday, October 19, 2020

Comm2: Two causes for lectures; omitted section restored (Prologue 1)

      This continues from Part 1 (Table of Contents in Part 1), a series presenting a new translation of C.F.W. Walther's Communism and Socialism from 1878. — In this installment we meet with the first portion that was omitted by the 1947 former translation by the "Lutheran Research Society". It is highlighted in light pink and darker pink.  I was quite puzzled as to why Walther's statement, that these lectures were not about politics at all but about religion, would be omitted.  Certainly it would not be for a Lutheran reason!  I became more determined to present this book as it was presented to the original German language congregation, and not be changed by later editors with an agenda different from Walther's.  These lectures were only about spiritual matters.  As such, they are much more effective than any politically motivated writing. — Now we will allow Walther to open our eyes to see "the flash from afar".
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
Translation of Walther's 1878 Communismus und Socialismus by BackToLuther primarily using DeepL online translation service; highlighting and bolding are my emphases, red text within square brackets [] are my comments, underlining is Walther's emphasis. Red highlight indicates omitted in 1947 translation.
C.F.W. Walther's Communism and Socialism(Part 2, p. 5-8)

Lecture I. [Prologue]

O God, Thou once created man good and blessed, and gave him a place to dwell in Paradise; but alas! man has fallen away from Thee, and thus has become a poor, unhappy creature, and his short life on earth is a life full of toil and misery.

But instead of man accusing himself for this and invoking Thy grace, he accuses Thee, denies Thy gracious providence and government and despairs of Thee, or pronounces in his heart the terrible word, “There is no God!”

Alas, protect us from such great blindness and sin, and enlighten our minds, that in the distress of this earth we may in deepest humility recognize the fruit of our apostasy, and rule our hearts, that we may not quarrel with Thee, our gracious Creator, but humble ourselves under Thy mighty hand in our toil and need, patiently awaiting Thy help, and comforting us with it, that the sufferings of this present time are not worthy of the glory which shall be revealed there in Thine.

Alas, have mercy on all suffering humanity, draw it to Thee through Thy Word, and then help it out of all bodily and spiritual distress and finally put it in the eternal kingdom of your joy and glory. Yea, do this for the sake of Jesus Christ, the Savior of the world.  Amen.

—————

It is a twofold cause, as the dear congregation knows, which has brought us together here today. The first reason was the appearance of a daily newspaper here in St. Louis, which wants to be the organ of the workers, and which has therefore also been chosen by some, especially younger, members of our congregation. The other reason was the emergence of so-called labor unions, which want to represent the interests of the workers to their employers.

"this newspaper– newer Communist ideas even by fire and sword"

Now would that newspaper really be an organ of the workers, which legitimately represented the interests of the workers, — who then could say a [page 6] word against it, if some worker made it his own and preferred it to other secular newspapers? And if the labor unions were basically nothing other than [1947-16] what the fraternities, guilds, trade unions and clubs were in Germany, — then who could make anyone feel it a matter of conscience about joining such a society? For the Apostle Paul tells us expressly that if Christians did not want to bind themselves at all, not even in business and civil matters, to the children of this world, they would have to leave the world altogether. But unfortunately! neither one nor the other is the case. First of all, this newspaper is not an organ for the workers alone, but it has set itself the goal of bringing the newer Communist ideas to the people and to realize them, if possible in peace, but if not, also by force, even by fire and sword. As far as the labor unions are concerned, it is well known that they were planned and set up by the Communists or Socialists, and that according to their meaning they are nothing other than a preschool for Communism and Socialism.

In order that no one might think that this was an empty statement, I had some issues of that newspaper, the so-called Volksstimme des Westens  [People's Voice of the West], sent to me, without asking which number would most accurately express the character of the newspaper. Nevertheless, I got my hands on the issues which clearly show this. In the December 24, 1877 issue, there is the continuation of an novella written by the editor of this newspaper, Dr. A. Otto-Walster [Walker?], in which it says the following:

“We will be particularly keen to prove that man with his claims to material well-being does not need to be dependent on another world, that he can and should find it here on earth, and here we recall the verses from Heinrich Heine's “A Winter's Tale”:

A song that’s new and truthful too,

Dear friends, I will indite for you—

A song of heaven here on earth,

Claimed by right of human birth.

We would be happy here below,

Nor longer suffer want and woe!

The lazy belly shall not spoil 

What faithful hands have won by toil.

On earth there grows enough of bread;

For all mankind the table’s spread; [1947-17]

Where rose and myrtle spring to please,

Why see, there too grow sugar peas.

Aye, sugar peas for best and worst,

As soon the pregnant pods may burst;

Celestial joys we leave indeed 

To angels and the sparrow breed.” [from Rev. C.T. Steck, 1879] [page 7]

"Politics does not concen us"

I think one only has to wonder, when one hears only one such passage, how a Christian who believes the Holy Scriptures to be the Word of God, believes in the Savior and hopes for eternal life, could support such a paper. Certainly, dear brethren, politics does not concern us theologians at all; also, as far as the economic conditions of the human society are concerned, we have nothing to say about them, and it does not occur to us to want to do so. One reads our church publications, and one will soon find that we do not interfere in these matters at all. It is not our office and calling. But if those who pretend to be politicians do interfere in Religion, then we cannot remain silent, or we will become traitors to the truth. And we shall not be such wretched cowards, who know how these people in their assemblies are fit to judge Christianity, that we should fear to illuminate here also with God's Word and to judge what they speak against God's Word in their assemblies and write in their papers! He would be a despicable man who called himself a Christian and was afraid to bear witness when his eternal divine Master was attacked and the reason for his hope ridiculed. Everyone sees that this paper is an atheistic one, whose editor believes neither in God nor in eternal life, but makes a mockery of both. If he says that he does believe in God and also in a hereafter, this is not our concern. We ask about what he writes in his newspaper. He must let himself be judged by that. But this, his newspaper, is an atheistic Communist newspaper.

That it is Communist, there is another testimony. If I had taken the trouble to look through the whole volume, I could have given many more testimonies, but even these few are perfectly adequate for our purpose. So it says in the number of December 15:

“Fire, water, air and earth are the four so-called elements of nature, of which the Deity gave as much to one person as to another. Who will, who can deny it? Therefore, you see, Doctor,” (it is an essay against a certain Dr. Holland), “that this Communism, commanded by our ‘Lord Jesus Christ’ to his disciples and followers is simultaneous with the creation of the world and man.”

So our dear Lord JEsus Christ is to be made the supreme Communist! It goes on:

“An all-wise and beneficent God, Himself the author, and ‘Christ’, the Son, asserts only that which ‘God the Father’ has from the beginning ordered and decreed.”

Christ, by the way, is cited here with quotation marks, also the words God, the Father. With this the writer [1947-18] wants to show his opponent: I [page 8] speak now in your sense; of course I do not believe in any Christ, and I do not believe in any God the Father. But I want to fight with your own weapons for once. You want to be a servant of the written word, as you call it, well, I will beat you out of your own word of God, and show you that if you want to be a true believer in the Bible, you must also become a Communist. That is the point. — It goes on to say: “This is God's command and Christ's teaching” Furthermore: 

"flash from afar before the terrible thunderstorm"

The workers of America do not think of putting themselves under the wheels of this so-called civilization, which is nothing other than barbarism, and being crushed to death, seeing their little ones condemned to eternal poverty and to perpetual misery, so that a few select people may remain rich and lazy. They will no longer kiss the hands of those who beat them. They will no longer caress the chains that bind them. They will rise, they are rising up already, in the majesty of their power and manhood to crush this vile and terrible monster, to defend their rights as men and to become free and happy.

This is yet very moderate talk here. But anyone who knows the story knows where this is leading. It is the flash from afar before the terrible thunderstorm which these men intend to conjure up on the present generation. If they cannot achieve their ends in peace, well, they will use violence, and bloody violence at that. They want to crush this giant they think they have trampled underfoot.
- - - - - - - - - - - - -  Continued in Part 3: Prologue 2  - - - - - - - - - - - - 

Saturday, October 17, 2020

Walther: Communism and Socialism–a re-translation; labor unrest then, now racial; History restored (Part 1)

C. F. W. Walther (Image: Find-A-Grave)
        This begins a series of blog posts to present a new English translation of C.F.W. Walther's addresses published in 1878.  That this topic is important in 2020 needs no justification. I am doing this for several reasons as explained below. I would give it a lengthy subtitle using the following from his concluding section:
"So let every Christian, if he still allows himself to be warned, be seriously warned against the agitations of the Socialists and Communists."
Politics or Religion?
      It may be wondered that in delivering these addresses, Walther was getting involved in political matters, not spiritual.  But that is not true.  There are indeed matters that may seem political, but it is only in a tangential way. To give a short quote from page 7, Walther flatly states:
Politics does not concern us theologians at all; … It is not our office and calling.”

That the later publishers of a "revised English translation" in 1947 and 1964 may have begun to mix some politics into this writing cannot be ruled out, and that might explain why the currently available version does not contain the above statement.  More will be explained elsewhere. I wonder that the editor of either "Hope Publicity Bureau" or "Lutheran Research Society" showed some weakness by pushing Walther's addresses somewhat into the political sphere, while Walther's intent was only to address the matters touching on Religion.— There will be scholars of history who will, to some degree, differ from Walther regarding the motives behind these dual menaces.  That is to be expected, for the world does not understand the heart of Communism and Socialism.  At their core, they are about spiritual matters, not political.

Re-translation, not re-publication
      In 1878, the publishing house for the Old (German) Missouri Synod printed four addresses, or lectures, in the German language, that President C. F. W. Walther delivered at the request of his Lutheran congregation in St. Louis. I recall reading a translation of these lectures many years ago and realized that they presented the definitive history for Christians regarding the threat of Communism and Socialism.
       Background information on the history of translations may be found in the prefaces to the 1947 reprint published by "The Lutheran Research Society" in Detroit, an organization which has likely disappeared long ago.  Currently there are several copies of this text available online: CTS-FW Media has a scanned copy of the 1947 printed pamphlet (but missing pages 30-31) [2020-10-19: correct copy now on Internet Archive]; more recently Steadfast Lutherans blog has it (PDF); Intrepid Lutherans has it.  These all appear to have used the same source material to provide their copy.  But after reading this translation again and seeing how important the information was, I wondered if the first translation, done in 1879 and republished in 1947 with revisions, included all of Walther's narrative or not.  So I thought to re-translate the original German publication to find out. I was surprised to find that some portions were omitted in certain translation(s), but it is not known if these omissions were made in the original 1879 translation by "D. Simon".  The discovery of these omissions made me even more glad that I proceeded with this re-translation. These omissions are identified and fully restored in what follows and will be pointed out in due course. — Additional benefits of this re-translation include: (1) Walther's emphasized words and phrases are indicated with underlining, (2) dozens of hyperlinks are added for reference because of the extensive array of historical people and events introduced, (3) links are added for ease of navigation, (4) Bible verses are identified and hyperlinked, and (5) notations in red showing the corresponding 1947 page number are included. 

History restored, in two ways
      What is generally not so well understood among the population is what is the basis of today's unrest in America and the world. A proper history by a truly Christian teacher is greatly needed to rightly understand this kind of unrest which it has occurred repeatedly in the past, since the beginning of time. As I reviewed Walther's historical events in Wikipedia, it became apparent that what purports to be "objective" history today has in reality added subjective judgments mixed in, judgments that sometimes completely miss the heart of the matter, or even overturn it.  It was not uncommon to find reports attempting to mitigate the heinous nature of some of the actions of certain people and thus obliquely justifying violence and the use of force.  One thing is certain – Walther's history will not be accepted for use by The History Channel or even by Wikipedia because it would be considered to be un-objective.  It will not be promoted by today's LC-MS, even if a few of their pastors do. Dare I suggest that it would not have been promoted in the LC-MS even in 1947?
      The second way Walther restores true history is found in the portions which have been omitted in the currently available English translations (CTS-FW).  Suffice to say that the LCMS does not actually subscribe to the Lutheran Confessions (or Martin Luther) which firmly teaches that the Pope in Rome is the very Antichrist.  Surprisingly we will see evidence of this aberration even in 1947.
——————
      Because Walther presents such a profusion of historical events and people in such a short narrative, I was interested to learn more of the details of these that Walther had to omit for the sake of brevity.  Wikipedia was a great help in providing some of the details. But the German Lutherans at that time in 1878 were much closer to some of these events that were going on in the world in the 19th century – the 1848 uprising in Germany, the horrific events of the French Revolution, etc. So German Americans may not have needed the details because they were already aware of them.  But today, we seem far removed from them, at least it would seem so… until the events of June 2020 and afterwards in America.  Now we are living through this "history"… again. — Now we begin a fresh translation of the most authoritative history ever given of the menaces of Communism and Socialism. The "Preface" below aptly uses the term "a burning issue."
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
Translation of Walther's 1878 Communismus und Socialismus by BackToLuther primarily using DeepL online translation service; highlighting and bolding are my emphases, red text within square brackets [] in are my comments, underlining is Walther's emphasis.

Preface.


Although the undersigned [Walther] only reluctantly complied with the urgent request of the local Lutheran congregation to have printed what he freely presented to them on the specific occasion of four evening meetings on Socialism and Communism, and were stenographically recorded, the editor hopes that the indulgent and impartial reader will excuse the unavoidable deficiencies that adhere to the form of these pages by the nature of their origin and, for the sake of these deficiencies, will not reject the truth represented therein without examination. May what is presented here, in which the special circumstances of the aforementioned congregation were the decisive factor, serve as a basis for making wider circles aware of a question that is also becoming more and more a burning issue for Christians, and for more thorough and all-round answers to it from Scripture, reason and history, so that those who are given more leisure than the

Publisher.

St. Louis, Mo.  March 1878.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - Continued in Part 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
      Since these addresses were probably held in the church building proper, I would suggest that we think of ourselves now also sitting in a pew as we begin this journey. Find an open pew, take a seat, and let us sit at the feet of the American Luther and receive the great history and lessons for Christians, even reasonable people.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -  TABLE OF CONTENTS  - - - - - - - - - - - - 
Part 1: Intro: Politics or Religion?; Re-translation, not re-publication; History restored; "Preface"
Part 2: Prologue 1– Two causes for lectures: newspapers, labor unions; omitted section restored
Part 3: Prologue 2– no personal property?; Unions–preschool for Socialism; Karl Marx in England
Part 4: Reason, Nature, Experience 1: Men are not equal
Part 5: RNE2: Men are selfish by nature; Fourier's Phalanxes
Part 6: RNE3: Happiness not in earthly things, only in Word of God;“Johann the Soap Boiler”; against unjust rich and Socialists
Part 7: RNE4: Communists never achieved goal, only misery; Spartans, Pythagoras, Plato, Essenes, Catholics, peasants
Part 8: RNE5: Luther on oppressors; Münster; French Revolutions: 1st & 2nd
Part 9: RNE6: French uprising 1839; Saint-Simonianism; 1848 Revolution; "Young Germany", Weitling; "We aren't united now."
Part 10: RNE7: Paris Commune, Fourier, Icarians, Proudhon, Lecomte, Blanqui: "Achieved nothing"
Part 11: X†1: Christianity? Bible misused: Gen. 1:26-29 – Remember Cain and Abel
Part 12: X†2: No Personal Property, no peace & unity; man’s love for freedom, independence
Part 13: X†3: No Personal Property, No incentive, no justice
Part 14: X†4: Common property at Jerusalem congregation (Acts 4:32-38)
Part 15: X†5: Rich Young Man (Matt. 19:16-25); Vineyard Workers (Matt. 20:1–16)
Part 16: X†6: Contrary to: personal property, government power of sword, marriage, sin, etc.; 7th, 5th, 6th Commandments
Part 17-IIIa: Church hinders? Papacy, Crusades, Protestant State Churches— Walther uncensored
Part 18-IIIb: : Hinders? Dark history not of true Church; Tyrants not Christians; the tyrant, the Pope
Part 19-IIIc: : Blaming Church for class relations an injustice; Christianity changes hearts, so relations, also "race relations"
Part 20: Conclusion: mirage to deceived wanderer – be warned; One has come from over there

Sunday, October 11, 2020

Luther's warning: contradict the willful spirits, "a wolf and a fox"

      There were so many jewels of spiritual wisdom gleaned from Hochstetter's History.  One of those I marked for a future blog, from page 473, was a quote from Martin Luther that Hochstetter used to defend the Missouri Synod's polemics against false doctrine.  It is much needed counsel for the church today.  Although I found the source of the Luther quote in the St. Louis Edition, I could not find where this full specific writing was translated into English.  This seemed quite strange to me because I recall reading references to it in other writings.  An essay entitled (translated) “Important Points in the Proper Evaluation and Utilization of the Written Testimony Against Unionism” by Prof. Paul Kretzmann in CTM, vol. 4, p. 915 (Dec. 1933) also quoted Luther from this same writing.  It refers to the upcoming Regensburg Colloquy of 1546 – see this reference to the preparation for this "hopeless" conference, as Luther calls it. So here is my translation, except for the portion dark highlighted, which is Dr. Fred Kramer's translation that I used in Hochstetter's History.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Translation by BackToLuther using online resources from St.L ed. Vol. 17, p. 1180; all highlighting and bolding are mine.

1425. Martin Luther's conversation, which he held with Dr. Georg Major before he left for the colloquium in Regensburg as a certain collocutor. Mid-January 1546.
This document is in the Altenburg edition, vol. VIII, p. 502; in the Leipzig edition, vol. XXI, p. 688 and in the Erlangen edition, vol. 65, p. 86.
Georg Major (image: VU, Amsterdam)

Doctor Major was sent to Regensburg at that time for the Colloquium instead of Philip [Melanchthon], for Dr. Luther was careful because of Philip's infirmity, and wrote to the princes of the church with these words: "Because it will be a vain and futile colloquium, since there is no hope, let Philip, who is truly ill, be spared; so Dr Major is more than enough for that, if he could not do anything but say no or yes to it. So let Schnepf and Brenz also be there, who will let nothing be taken from them, etc."

But when Dr. Major would travel to Regensburg, he went first to Dr. Luther to bless him, and in the entrance to his study room these words were written in Dr. Luther's hand: Nostri Professores examinandi sunt de Coena Domini, that is, "Our professors shall be examined on the Lord's Supper." So he asked: “Venerable Father, what do these words mean?” To which the great Doctor answered him: “What you read, and what they say, so it is the opinion, and when you return home, and I as well, an examination will have to be taken, for which you shall be required as well as others. But when Dr. Major wanted to get rid of his suspicions with great respect and clear confession, he finally got the answer:

Martin Luther

You make yourself suspicious with silence and cloaks; but if you believe, as you speak before me, so speak such things in the church, in lectures, debates and private conversations, and strengthen your brothers, and help the erring ones back on to the right path, and contradict the willful spirits, otherwise your confession will be merely a mask, and of no use. Whoever considers his doctrine, faith, and confession, to be true, and not uncertain, cannot stand in the same stall with others, who teach false doctrine, or are adherents of the same, and cannot continue to speak fair words to the devil and his allies. A teacher who keeps silence in the face of errors and nevertheless wants to be a true teacher is worse than an open enthusiast, and does greater harm with his hypocrisy than a heretic; you cannot trust him; he is a wolf and a fox, a hired servant and a belly server [Ro. 16:18], etc, and may despise and hand over doctrines, word, faith, sacrament, churches, and schools; either he lies secretly in cahoots with his enemies, or he is a doubter and a windfallower, and wants to see where it will end, whether Christ or the devil will prevail; or he is completely uncertain in himself, and not worthy that he should be called a pupil, let alone a teacher, and will not enrage anybody, nor speak Christ's Word, nor woe to the devil and the world, etc.” Dr. Major considered such things, pondered them, and faithfully promised to follow them, and thus was blessed by Luther; he also often recited and narrated such serious discourse, which the great man of God had given him.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
      This is a powerful Luther passage that speaks through the ages to the Christian Church.  Luther shows his great patience with those weak in faith, but was unbending on orthodoxy… which reminds me of C.F.W. Walther's manner.  Georg Major would later, after Luther's death, show his weakness by instigating the Majoristic Controversy, which was settled by the Formula of Concord.

Wednesday, October 7, 2020

Baier-Walther Compendium: Krauss’s book review

Prof. E. A. W. Krauss, Director, Addison Teacher's Seminary
     I have previously published in 2012 a pre-publication book review by Franz Pieper on the book series Baier-Walther Compendium I have recently discovered that another review was published for Volumes I and II in Lehre und Wehre at a later time by Prof. E. A. W. Krauss after some of volumes were completed in 1879.  He was not yet a professor in St. Louis at this time, but was the Director of the Teacher's Seminary in Addison, Illinois. As I translated this review, I was struck by the insight that Krauss had for the importance of this series in the instruction of Lutheran Dogmatics.  
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
From Lehre und Wehre, vol 25, no. 8 (August 1879), p 242-243); translation by BackToLuther using mostly DeepL and Yandex.  Highlighting and bolding are my emphasis. 
Baier-Walther Compendium Theologiae Positivae (image from P. McCain's cyberbrethren blog)

Joh. Guilielmi Baieri Compendium Theologiae Positivae, adjectis notis amplioribus, … denuo edendum curavit Carol. Ferd. Guil. Walther, ss. th. Doctor et Professor. Editio auctior et emendatior. In urbe Sancti Ludovici ex officina Synodi Missouriensis Lutheranae. MDCCCLXXIX.  Vol. I. II.

The new edition of the Compendium of Baier, which is now being delivered, has, by the grace of God, progressed so far that volumes I and II of it now lie before us in a stately, elegant half-French binding. It is a pleasant task for us to be able to communicate this to the honored readers of Lehre und Wehre. For there is no doubt that many who for various reasons have refrained from purchasing the individual deliveries until then will now gladly take the opportunity to take possession of the precious expanse which is now half completed.
It is true that the reader has already been informed of the internal arrangement of the latter, as well as of how it differs from the earlier editions of the Baier Compendium; but we shall be permitted to emphasize once more the characteristics of the new edition.
First of all, it offers the readers a text that is as clean as possible from printing errors. The errata inherent in the older editions and especially the most recent, often disruptive errata provided by Preuss, have been carefully corrected, so that in this respect the new edition may brazenly be described as the best of all that has been published so far. 
"great value above all  are the new additions… by… Dr. Walther"

But what gives the former great value above all are the new additions made by the esteemed editor, Dr. Walther. Well, it is his well-known and well-tried way of not expressing his dogmatic conviction with his own words but with the words of our Lutheran fathers. And that the dear man did not find the leisure to write a dogmatic according to his own design in his own words is something we, together with our honored theological readers, and indeed with the entire Lutheran Church of this country, regret with all our hearts
"such astonishing dogmatic meticulousness"
But the additions from the fathers which Dr. Walther added to Baier's arguments were chosen with such astonishing dogmatic meticulousness, with such detailed expertise, with such a surprising consideration of what must be brought back into the consciousness of the Church, especially in our time, that the reader has in them, together with Baier's text, not only a complete compendium of the dogmatic work of our Church, but at the same time also an armor [πανοπλία, Eph. 6:11] of the orthodox doctrine with which he can confidently enter the struggle with the proud spirits of modern theology without having to fear defeat
"Gerhard: simple, edifying words; Dannhauer: ingenious manner; Quenstedt: transparent logic"
There is no question in which our so-called Missouri theology is consciously opposed to modern “theological science”, which is not touched on in the new edition of Baier and which would be answered satisfactorily from God's Word either with the simple, edifying words of a Gerhard, or in the ingenious manner of a Dannhauer, or with the transparent logic of a Quenstedt. Even on open questions, proper secondary questions [quaestiones adnatae], insofar as they are of any importance, Walther brings rays of light from God's Word; he conscientiously juxtaposes pros and cons with the words of orthodox teachers, but never leaves the reader in the dark as to which opinion he himself is inclined to hold and which he therefore considers to be the more Scriptural.
"Pseudo-Lutherans: revealed and judged… by their own words"
Particularly valuable are the antitheses added by Dr. Walther, in which the contrast to the developed doctrines is expressed. Older, later, and the latest false teachers — the latter, if they claim the name “Lutheran” for themselves — fill this catalog of heresies [Catalogus haeresium], and especially with regard to modern theologians it is of great value that they thus are revealed and judged as Pseudo-Lutherans by their own words. At the same time, the antitheses also offer interesting dogmatic-historical material.
Thus this precious work, which of course is predestined for the use of our students, is warmly recommended to all lovers of thorough dogmatic studies. For most of our dear readers, the difficulties of studying it have long since disappeared, and for others they are all the easier to overcome, since the difficult technical terms [termini technici], where they occur for the first time, have been explained by a quotation from Scharff, Walch, or others. A foundation and fortification in the saving doctrine will be the rewarding success of all the effort put into Baier's Enlarged and Corrected Edition [Editio auctior et emendatior].
Volumes I and II contain the Introduction [Prolegomena] and the first two parts; the third volume will contain the third part of the Compendium together with Indexes. The price of the present volume, for its excellent features in every respect, is justly $3.50. E. W. K. [E. A. W. Krauss]
 – – – – – – –  End of Review  – – – – – – – –
      Unfortunately I could not find a review of Volumes IIIa and IIIb in Lehre und Wehre.  But the above comments would certainly apply for the whole series.
      It is a sad failing of the LCMS Christian Cyclopedia, in its description of Prof. Krauss, that it did not carry forward the full history of him from Old Missouri's The Concordia Cyclopedia of 1927.  Krauss shows not only his scholarly understanding of theology, he also understood the great spiritual value of Walther’s undertaking for this book series. The 1927 Cyclopedia even pointed out Krauss's "stupendous learning" and that his work was "highly edifying to the lover of Lutheranism" – high praise indeed, especially for Old Missouri!  We found a brief mention of him in Hochstetter's History (p. 176), and then we saw him grow greatly in his spiritual understanding in the Predination Controversy on p. 377, just 1-2 years after this book review was written.  That experience mimics Hochstetter's own experience of coming out of darkness by the Word of God and the Lutheran Confessions.

Sunday, October 4, 2020

Hist22b: Critical: Suelflow, Schmelder, Peperkorn, etc.

      This concludes from Part 22a (Table of Contents in Part 3), a series presenting an English translation of Pastor Christian Hochstetter's 1885 496-page book entitled (abbreviated) The History of the Missouri Synod, 1838-1884. — This concludes the final installment to the series. 

Roy Suelflow.  It was troubling to find this name among those who would criticize a portion of Hochstetter's work.  But there it was, in his 1946 ThD thesis "The History of the Missouri Synod During the Second Twenty-Five Years of its Existence 1872-1897".  On p. 177, candidate R. Suelflow states:
Hochstetter in his History of the Missouri Synod gives a very distorted picture of the events of 1881 because he presents the action of the Ohio Synod of 1881 without giving first the preceding action of the Missouri Synod at its Convention of 1881. 207 (207. Chr. Hochstetter: Die Geschichte, der Evangelisch lutherischen Missouri-Synode in Nord Amerika. Heinrich J. Naumann, Dresden, 1885, p. 341 ff.)
I was quite saddened to see this criticism, "a very distorted picture", because of Dr. Suelflow's later self-published independent translations of Walther's formerly unpublished letters in translation.  This critical attitude can be explained in part by discovering that the faculty signatories of this dissertation, and presumably Suelflow's advisors, were William PolackTheodore Graebner, and William Arndt.  These prominent St. Louis faculty members had also signed the infamous "Statement of the 44", a syncretistic manifesto, at about the same time!  It is no wonder that a critical attitude against an Old Missouri history would find a sympathetic ear, maybe even encouragement, among all three of these faculty members because of their doctrinal weakness and demise.  Let the reader search my blog for evidence of this.

William Schmelder. It was again troubling to find this name as a criticizer of Old Missouri historians.  While he seemed generally favorable in his assessment of Walther, yet in his 1960 STM Thesis "The Altenburg Debate" he states on p. 48-49:
“In the first place, some of the writers of this period have tried to picture Walther as the serene student, calmly and quietly searching for a solution to the problems which faced the colony; Koestering and Hochstetter (27) seem ["seem"? Schmelder admits he is conjecturing.] to convey this picture to the reader. However, …(27) Hochstetter, op. cit., pp. 20-21. ”
I have thoroughly read and studied Hochstetter's history and find Schmelder's subjective charge against both Koestering and Hochstetter to be baseless, in the footsteps of Walter Forster. — As with Roy Suelflow, we find that Schmelder's faculty Advisor Carl S. Meyer and Reader Erwin L. Lueker were products of their forefathers, the "Statement of the 44", and ended up in the 1974 "Walkout" crowd. They too would practically encourage criticism of Old Missouri historians by Concordia Seminary candidates.
      I have already mentioned Rev. Peperkorn in a previous post in this series.  He also made specific charges against Hochstetter in his 2001 Logia "Book Review" (vol. 10, no. 4, p. 44-45textof August Suelflow's Servant of the Word  (comments set apart in red): 
Suelflow calls Hochstetter’s 1885 history of the Missouri Synod “a comprehensive history of the Missouri Synod,” (144), and said, “the book continues to be the most reliable source available from that time.” This is complicated. [Oh? Well, us readers had better listen to Peperkorn because "this is complicated"!] Hochstetter was originally J. A. A. Grabau’s deacon in Buffalo, New York. He left in 1867 and came to the Missouri Synod. [Some might say this puts Hochstetter in exactly the right place to present this history.  Will Peperkorn?] His history was actually a recounting of the Missouri Synod’s doctrinal controversies, not a history per se. [We see by this statement what "Historical Theology" is to Peperkorn – it is not about doctrinal issues, not about what they teach.Hochstetter does not even mention Walther’s Kirche und Amt. [False. See pages 218 and 262. Why would Peperkorn promote this false idea? Surely it is not because he is a poor scholar.] Furthermore, Hochstetter was a disgruntled ["disgruntled?" – not enlightened by Scripture's teaching?] former Buffalo Synod pastor. He can hardly be expected to present a balanced or reliable treatment of Grabau and the controversy over church and office in the mid-nineteenth century. (Besides, if Hochstetter is the most “reliable source” from that time, why has a full translation of Hochstetter been sitting in CHI waiting publication for seventeen years?) [This is quite a pointed question by Peperkorn! Why indeed!  Surely Peperkorn knows the true answer to that question, for CHI is not in the business of publishing books – that is left to CPH.  So the real question is: "Why did CPH knowingly ignore this Kramer translation?" —  If Rev. Peperkorn had not made this revealing comment of an existing English translation, I may never have known about it, and therefore would never have tackled this project of publishing Hochstetter in English.  My thanks to Rev. Peperkorn for his revelation, but not for his misleading, and caustic, "Book Review" of Suelflow… and Hochstetter. We see now what the qualification is to be the Chairman of the Board of Regents in today's LCMS!]
Matthew Harrison published in his House of My Fathers book, p. 569-570 an 1887 private letter from Franz Pieper to an unknown "President".  Unfortunately among the topics covered was a criticism of "Hochstetter's petition" for which Harrison could give no background or outcome.  He could not even confirm that it was Pastor Christian Hochstetter.  While I have little doubt that this is authentic, it was poor judgment to include this portion without the surrounding details and so causes the reader to question Hochstetter's overall theology.  But no reason is revealed and no outcome of this supposed criticism of Hochstetter is given. — It may be added that Harrison gives no basis for saying that Hochstetter's book contained "a history of the Stephanite immigration written by Walther". There is no hint of Walther's authorship within Hochstetter's book and this statement appears to be an error on Harrison's part.  If this were true, it would refute those, like Forster, who charge Hochstetter with "imagination" in his history of the emigration.

John Wohlrabe Jr. mentions Hochstetter in his essay "Walther's Doctrine of the Ministry: A Distinctly Mediating Position" in the anthology Soli Deo Gloria: Essays on C.F.W. Walther, p. 205, fn # 415:
A detailed analysis of the Stephanite Emigration from Saxony to the United States is set forth in Walter O. Forster, Zion on the Mississippi: …. Also see Christian Hochstetter, Die Geschichte der Evangelische-lutherischen Missouri Synode in Nord-Amerika und ihrer Lehrkaempfe (Dresden: Naumann, 1885), 1-18.
Although one could take comfort that Dr. Wohlrabe seems to give some credit to Hochstetter, yet he subordinates him to Forster. Does Wohlrabe not know that Forster made serious charges against Hochstetter's History using multiple pejorative terms… rendering Hochstetter's History to be untrustworthy?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
      Most of the criticisms by these LC-MS writers apply to all those historians "in the [Old!] Missouri Synod".  That is reason enough to translate and publish them again… as a testimony against today's LC-MS, the Lutheran Church—"Missouri Synod", so-called.  Enough from the LC-MS! Scholars may scoff at this, but I would conclude this listing by quoting the words of author Stella Wuerffel, with a substitution. The LC-MS theologians' writings against Hochstetter are only an 

"opinionated interpretation of these events and people"

and Hochstetter's History is a testimony for true Church History.

Friday, October 2, 2020

Hist22a: LC-MS critical of Hochstetter's History: Forster, Mundinger, Rosin

[2025-08-31 updated link to Wuerffel book]
      This continues from Part 21 (Table of Contents in Part 3), a series presenting an English translation of Pastor Christian Hochstetter's 1885 496-page book entitled (abbreviated) The History of the Missouri Synod, 1838-1884. — This final installment to the series has the unpleasant task of exposing the many criticisms made by LC-MS theologians and leaders against Hochstetter's History.

Walter O. Forster: Zion on the Mississippi 
Stella Wuerffel's book "Two Rivers to Freedom"
    Rather than list all the many criticisms and innuendos by Forster against Hochstetter (and others), I will repeat a comment by Stella Wuerffel († 1994, Find-A-Grave), author of the 1980 book Two Rivers to Freedom [2025-08-31 updated link] (see here), concerning Forster's reliability as a historian of church matters.  Wuerffel, in her book which is descriptive of the 1838-39 Saxon Lutheran Emigration and contains a surprisingly laudatory "Foreword" by CHI Director August Suelflow, states her "Preface", p. iii [2025-08-31 added link] (my emphasis):
"Walter Förster's opinionated interpretation of these events and people"
"Opinionated"? – I had to laugh out loud when I read this comment by the dear Ms. Wuerffel, for she is the only writer I have found who publicly pronounced the proper judgment of Forster's work.  Needless to say, Ms. Wuerffel would hardly judge Hochstetter the same as Forster. — Dr. August Suelflow stated of author Wuerffel that "she undoubtedly knows the events described more intimately than any other living person."

Carl S. Mundinger: Government in the Missouri Synod, p. 17-18:
The traditional way of describing the spiritual side of life in Saxony during the early decades of the nineteenth century is to call it the Age of Rationalism. Usually such adjectives as “dark,” “bleak,” “sterile,” and “oppressive” are added to make the picture supposedly complete. Writers, particularly those in the Missouri Synod, assume that rationalism was exclusively dominant [a misleading, or false, statement, otherwise what was the Prussian Union about if rationalism wasn't dominant?; exceptions were pointed out: Rudelbach, Harless, Guericke, Brunn, Zorn, Scheibel, even Loehe, and others are specifically pointed out as welcome exceptions], that it was growing in power during this decade and that it was making life progressively impossible for those who wished to maintain a Bible-centered faith. (Hochstetter, Die Geschichte der Evangelisch-Lutherischen Missouri Synode… ) … p. 18: Aside from the fact that it is frequently misleading and quite often inaccurate and unhistorical to call a certain number of years that have been deftly dated at both ends an “age” of something, rationalism in Saxony during the fourth decade of the nineteenth century was lacking in vigor. It was definitely on the decline [Ms. Wuerffel's book is another testimony against Mundinger's false judgment].
Mundinger may be less caustic than Forster in his criticism's, but he is essentially in the same camp. We see this in his Springfielder essay “Carl Ferdinand Wilhelm Walther Churchman” where he states of Schieferdecker’s exclamation over the Altenburg Theses, p. 28-29: “Whether it was really the 'Easter Day' of the bedeviled colony, as one of the participants, the exuberant Schieferdecker, later called it, may be questioned.” Leave it to an LCMS historian, Mundinger, to kill the "exuberance" over Walther's great work! Mundinger echos the comments of the opponents of the Old Missouri. Sad for the LC-MS. Mundinger's history also "may be questioned".

Wilbert Rosin, in his "Preface" to Dr. Fred Kramer's 1987 English translation of Walther's The Congregation’s Right To Choose Its Pastor said (p. VI) :
     Parenthetically we might note that a half century later Christian Hochstetter in his history of the Missouri Synod speaks of differences between Stephan and Walther even before they came to America, differences which allegedly [Rosin follows Forster's  "opinionated" questioning attitude] caused Stephan to suspect Walther and even assign a roommate to spy on Walther. No proof is supplied. [Hochstetter's "imagination"?] Walther approved this writing. [Walther would not approve slander against Stephan. Neither did Stella Wuerffel.] Walther offers no hint of this. [Walther cared primarily about the doctrinal issue, "doctrine vs. life".] That Walther was chosen to go from Saint Louis to Perry County to confront Stephan in 1839 may have stirred Hochstetter's imagination and influenced his memory and interpretation five decades later. [Where is Rosin's objectivity now?? Rosin has already passed judgment by airing this conjecture. The "opinionated" spirit of the LC-MS and Forster…]
     Consider that Hochstetter wrote just two decades after Leopold von Ranke attempted to write his history of the papacy wie es eigentlich gewesen [how it actually was] and historians were just beginning to stress the importance of objectivity in historical writing. [Rosin values so-called "objectivity" over spiritual understanding, over doctrine? See Pieper on "Historical Theology"]
It should be noted that Prof. Rosin also stated in his Preface to this 1987 translation: 
"We were overjoyed when Dr. Kramer volunteered to translate Walther's Das Gemeindewahlrecht just when we were finding it impossible to carry out the project in time for a graduate course. Dr. Kramer worked swiftly but carefully, thereby making our task much easier." 
This was 3 years after Kramer had finished his translation of Hochstetter's History in 1984.  Could it be that Dr. Kramer was strengthened greatly by Hochstetter so that he "volunteered" to translate Walther's writing, having learned of the truthfulness and very real orthodoxy of Old Missouri?  (Where are the volunteers to translate Walther today?)
       In the next Part 22b, more criticisms of Hochstetter by other LC-MS theologians.