Search This Blog

Tuesday, December 26, 2023

"What is a Sect?" Pieper's answer (LuW 1900)

      To follow my blog of Feb. 5, 2023 on Walther's 1871 essay against Unionism, a short blurb by Dr. Franz Pieper in Lehre und Wehre from the year 1900 addresses a question many people, like me, may have, namely What is a sect?.  The blurb quotes an exchange between two church papers, one Reformed, the other Lutheran. Then Pieper sets both of them straight with a Luther-like answer. — From Lehre und Wehre, vol. 46 (1900), p. 346 [EN]:
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -  
Dr. Franz Pieper, c. 1914
F. Pieper (1914)

What is a sect? The Christian Ambassador [Evangelical Church (Reformed)] reproaches the Lutheran Herald [New York Ministerium (Lutheran)]: 


"While we are pleased with the kind notice, we must also express our regret that the [Lutheran] Herald could not give us a deserved recognition without expressing its disdain or contempt for that which does not fit its mold. He does this with the word sect which Lutherans, when referring to other denominations, never use other than in a contemptuous sense. We think, however, that in view of the serious disunity of Lutheranism in this country, it does not look good for a Lutheran to call other denominations by the opprobrious name of sect."


To this the [Lutheran] Herald replies: 


"The sober judgment of the Christian Ambassador has run away with its sensitivity. There was certainly not the least thing in that note of the Herald that could cause the Ambassador to smell contempt or disdain. We applied the word sect to the Evangelical fellowship according to conventional theological usage. The words 'church' and 'sect' are fixed terms and are usually applied by Lutherans according to their meaning [according to what meaning? L. u. W.]. We would never call, for example, the Roman Church a sect, although it is much less 'according to our mold' than the Evangelical fellowship." 


Why then does the Herald [Lutheran] not want to call the Roman Church a sect? Luther and the Lutheran teachers often speak of the "sect of the pope," "the Roman sect," etc. A sect is a fellowship of people who have accepted doctrines contrary to Scripture in one or more articles of the Christian faith and, on the basis of this false doctrine, keep themselves separate from Christians who abide in all parts by the Word of God, and thus cause or maintain division and trouble in the Christian church. This is true both of the Roman and the various Reformed church fellowships.   F. P.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Note well that Pieper does not comment against the Reformed writer, rather he exposes the confusion of the Lutheran writer because he soft-pedals the difference with the Roman Church.
While Walther in his 1871 essay gave some examples of sects — the Reformed, Baptists, and Methodists, along with their leading errors — Franz Pieper spoke to the general question of "What is a Sect". Now Lutherans can use this term of "sect" confidently if they realize and believe that what the Lutheran Church teaches is Scriptural. If they do not believe this, then they are not true Lutherans.
Today's LC-MS leaders and teachers appear to be in the same camp of "Lutherans" as the above New York Ministerium, who would "never call the Roman Church a sect." Can they be truly called "Lutheran"?

No comments:

Post a Comment

Comments only accepted when directly related to the post.