Search This Blog

Tuesday, March 12, 2013

Old Missouri library – Convention Essays (Part 3)

[Last update: Sept. 2, 2026; see additions in "Appendix" below.]
This continues from the previous Part 2 which presented download links to the entire series of the periodical journal Der Lutheraner.  In this post, I am providing the links to the scanned copies and a few transcriptions of most of the convention essays that C.F.W. Walther and Franz Pieper presented to the old (German) Missouri Synod and the Synodical Conference.  There are also two by F. Bente and one by George Mezger.  Although many of these essays have been translated and published by Concordia Publishing House (CPH), yet the largest books of translations of Walther's essays, Essays For The Church, are currently unavailable.  They are promised to be made available again in the future.  Used copies may be available on Amazon or elsewhere.

In a previous post over a year ago, I published a spreadsheet of most of the Convention Essays of the old Missouri Synod and Synodical Conference.  That spreadsheet will be of great value for reference in sorting through all of these wonderful essays.  It especially indicates where English translations might be available.

The file names should be fairly self-evident:   Year-District-Author-Title.PDF or DOC
Most files are PDF scans of the original German.  Sprinkled throughout are a few DOC files of the German text which I was able to transcribe.  These make it quite easy to copy text into Google Translate for a quick view. [August 2015- but see the many added links to OCR text of original German]

Updates: 2026: Sept. 1, unlocked 1869 Missouri essay on Usury; Aug. 25, unlocked 1859 Western for public access; 
2025: Oct. 10: updated 1873 Western links; Sept. 16: updated 1916 S. Illinois; Sept. 11: updated 1902 Missouri Synod links; Aug. 25, updated 1877, 1879, 1880 Western District; Aug. 21: updated 1868 Northern;July 13: updated 1877, 1879, 1880 Western District links – on Election; May 10 updated 1898 Pardieck essay; May 9 updated 1891, 1893, 1896, 1897 essays' links ; April 18 updated 1867 Norther; Mar. 15:updated info on 1862 Western District; added English 1863 Missouri Synod. Feb. 19: updated 1857 Missouri; Jan. 3: updated 1876 Northwestern with Walther info; 
2024: Dec. 29: updated 1902 Missouri Synod, 1913 & 1916 S. Illinois; Nov. 23: updated links to 1912 Syn. Conf.; Nov. 10 & Oct. 2: 1870 Eastern updated; Sep. 20: updated 1867 Northern, 1860 Missouri; Sep. 17: updated 1858 Western; updated 1865 Northern; Sep. 11: updated links to Walther and the Church book; Aug. 24: updated link to At Home in the House of my Fathers to the Internet Archive copy; Tappert's translations now on Internet Archive; Aug. 18: updated links; Aug. 11: corrected 1862 Western, not Walther's address!; Aug. 9: udated links to scanned essays relating to True Visible Church essay; July 25, changed some links 1862; June 10: updated 1860 Brohm, Absolution; May 5: updated 1930 Pieper Eastern; May 1- updated & added links; Apr. 20; added EN translation to 1878 Missouri Synod address by Walther; Mar. 30, updated 1848 Synod Address; 
2023:  July: updated 1896 Synod; Apr. 26, 1859 Western; Jan. 1; 2022: July 3: updated 1929 Pieper essay info; Feb 2: updated 1888 Syn. Conf. downloads, added DE version; 2020: Sept 20: added 1898 Illinois, Pardieck; Sept. 7: added several links to Baseley translations of Walther sermons/addresses; August 21: added Baseley link to 1874 Missouri; July 26: updated 1877 Western, 1869 Missouri links; May 4: updated, added links; 2019: Nov. 9: added link to scanned 1924 Pieper-Oregon-Washington "Unionsm"; Sept. 30: fixed Western District links; Jun 8: added 1920 Delegate Synod; Jan 28: added links to LCMS downoads of Convention proceedings here; 2018: Nov. 4- added 1880 Iowa-Pieper scanned originals; Oct. 16- updated info on translation for 1912 Syn. Conf. sermon by Pieper; October 9- updated 1884 Synodical Conference with full title of James Ware's CJ translation; May 24- updated 1899 Missouri by Pieper; May 5 - added link to 1888 Syn. Conf. PDF, updated links to Google Book Syn. Conf 1882-1912; April 7 & 9 - appendix added - Iowa 1891, 1892;  Jan. 31 - added link to sermon for 1867 Eastern District by Walther; Jan. 20 - updated with Concordia Journal translations; 2017: July 11: added new English translation to 1921 Pieper-North Dakota-Montana, "What Do We Learn from Luther at Worms?"; May 21: added links to English translations of Pieper's 1893 Missouri Synod address ; May 11: added link to 1913-Southern Illinois -- HathiTrust; Mar. 8: added note on 1860-Missouri, upgraded all DropBox links; Feb. 26: added 1867 Colloquy between Iowa & Missouri Synods(not convention); 2016: Oct. 28-29: added PDF scan of 1890 Pieper from DL; added 1930 Dau, updated 1923, 1929 Missouri Delegate; Sept. 11: updated WLS essays links; August 13: updated 1882, 1883, 1885, 1889, 1891 Southern; July 12: Updated info on 1862 Western; April 14: 1911 Missouri - German text;1908 Missouri - German text; April 1: Added 1886 Syn. Conf essay text; Feb 19: Added text 1876 Northern, 1877 Eastern, 1879 Western, 1880 Western, 1887 Missouri;  Feb 18: Added text 1860 Missouri Syn. On Absolution - Brohm, 1873 Eastern-Walther-Secret Societies; Feb 17: Added text file for 1867 Northern Distr., Walther-Exegesis; Feb. 5: Updated most Synodical Conf. essays with Google Bks links; August 16-17-18-19-20: Added numerous links to German text files: search Text file HEREAugust 5: Added 1872 Missouri - Walther - 25th Years - Not Lose God's Blessings, But Bequeath to Descendents; August 3: Updated 1879 Iowa - Duties of Ev. Lutheran Church to include CPH phamplet; August 1: Added references to At Home in the House of My FathersJuly 28: Added scan of 1896 Missouri-Pieper-Church Government; July 27: Added 1872 English Conf. - Walther - 16 Theses; July 26: Added 1927 British Columbia- Alberta-Pieper; Added 1867-Northern-Walther; July 25: Added cross references to old Selected Writings of C.F.W. Walther - Convention Essays book (see Amazon used); Added cross references to the new Walther's Works: Church Fellowship book; July 24: Added cross-references to Essays for the Church I & IIJuly 22 Added text to 1919 Atlantic District/Pieper: The General Christian Character of the Lutheran Church; Added text doc for 1885 Southern/Pieper essay on "Life in Faith"; Added text doc for 1885 Iowa/Pieper essay on Certainty of Salvation; Added text doc for 1891 Southern/Pieper on Doctrine of Church, Individual Christians, Congregations, Whole Church Bodies;  July 21: Added text document for 1893 Missouri/Pieper essay on "Our Position in Doctrine and Practice; Added text download 1905 Missouri/Pieper essay; Added text DOCX to 1899 Missouri/ Pieper essay Church and God's Word; July 19: added full text 1870 Eastern District- Antichrist; July 18, : added 1916 Southern Ill. Pieper- Reconciliation of God with Man, also remaining original essays used in What Is Christianity? book; July 17: updated 1902 Missouri Synod Pieper essay What Is Christianity? essay, also several others in the book of that name; March, 2015: updated with 2 items on WLSEssays.net; 
December, 2014 - added references to Tappert's translations; added Google Books scans where found; search terms "intitle:synodal inauthor:missouri" or "intitle:verhandlungen inauthor:missouri" [editable list here]

1847-Missouri (1st)-Walther sermon, translation by Baseley here;
1848-Missouri (2nd)-Walther- Synodical Address, relationship of Congregations to Synod -(Zweiter Synodal-Bericht, 1848) in July 1972 Concordia Theological Monthly , p. 430 ff.; Baseley here; Moving Frontiers here; At Home in the House of My Fathers, 1-9) [Updated 2024-03-30]
1849-Missouri (3rd)-Walther sermon, translation by Baseley here;
1850-Missouri (4th)-Walther-Synodical Address - Internet Archive copy, p. 115-121; copy in Lutherische Brosamen p 528-535; translated in Baseley From Our Master's Table, p. 248-251; translation by BTL here;
1851-Missouri (5th), Walther sermon, translation by Baseley here;
1852-Missour (6th)i, Walther sermon, translation by Baseley here;
1853-Missouri (7th), Walther sermon, translation by Baseley here;
1854-Missouri (8th), Walther sermon, translation by Baseley here;
1857-Missouri (9th)-Walther-Gerhard on Baptism  (No original; Translated English in Essays for the Church I, pgs 15-18; ref. p; 355-6 in original; 2025-02-19: an English translation of the oral discussion may be viewed here.
1858-Western-Walther-Confessional Subscription.pdf  (2024-09-17: see also Der Lutheraner, vol. 14 (1858), p. 201-206 ff. ; Translated English in Essays for the Church I, pgs 19-29)  (see English translation in Tappert - Lutheran Conf. Theol. in Am. 1840-1880, pgs 55-77; also C.T.M. April, 1947, Vol. XVIII, pgs 241-253; At Home in the House of My Fathers, pgs 120-137; and in Walther's Works: Church Fellowship, pgs 11-28); German title “Warum sind die symbolischen Bücher unserer Kirche von denen, welche Diener derselben werden wollen, nicht bedingt, sondern unbedingt zu unterschreiben?”
1859-Western-Walther-Doctrine of Justification.pdf  (see this blog series for new translation) (Translated English in Essays for the Church I, pgs 30-63); German text file HERE.
1860-Missouri (10th) -Brohm (not Walther)-Absolution.DOCX-- (PDF) Scanned copies of pages HERE. Full original copy here. -- ref. in Chr. Dogmatics III, pgs 191, 208-211 which includes several passages translated into English: “The theses were formulated by Pastor Brohm”; German text file HERE. LCMS download here; Walther sermon translation by Baseley here; See this blog post for English.
1861-Western-maybe Walther-Essay on the Law (see LuW61 Nov,Dec).pdf -- Walther present; FULL VERSION with all Luther's quotes published LuW, Nov-Dec 1861
1862-Western-Walther Schaller- Church and State.pdf  (Erroniously included in Essays for the Church I, pgs 64-68); German text file HERE. Walther's essay not available here, but was published in a separate book form in 1863-1864 Die rechte gestalt einer vom staate unabhängigen evangelisch-lutherischen ortsgemeinde. Or The [Right/Proper] Form of an Ev. Lutheran [Christian] Congregation. Also in Walther and the Church (1938-Dallman), pgs 86-115, online here; abbreviated version by Drickamer in Walther on the Church, here)
1863-Missouri (11th) -Walther-Proper Form-Calling a Pastor, Ordination.pdf  (Translated English in Essays for the Church I, pgs 69-87); German text file HERE. Walther On the Church, thesis 21 only p. 136-137; BTL English translation here; Sermon by Walther, Baseley translation here;
1866-Missouri-Walther-True Visible- Theses I-III (Church).pdf  (Translated English in Walther and the Church (1938-Dallman), pgs 116-128; also in Essays for the Church I (1992-Stallmann) pgs 88-103; also in The True Visible Church (1961-J.T. Mueller), pgs 1-137; Selected Writings of C.F.W. Walther - Walther on the Church (1981-Drickamer), pgs 155-192); German text file HERE.
1866-Missouri-Walther, Synodical Address, copy in Lutherische Brosamen p 535-543; translated in Baseley From Our Master's Table, p. 251-25x
1867-Eastern-Walther-True Visible, Theses XI-XIII.pdf   (Translated English in Essays for the Church I, pgs 145-159); German text file HERE.; Sermon translated by Studium Exitare issue #17 by Aaron Jensen here.

1867-Northern-Walther-Principles the Lutheran Church on Exegesis.pdf  -- (English translation >> HERE & HERE<<; referenced in Chr. Dogmatics I, pg 348, n. 154 [EN]- Pieper identifies author as Walther) -- Text file HERE
1869-Missouri-Brohm-Walther, Usury (51-85).pdf -- During height of controversy on Usury (Wucher); Full text HERE. [2020-07-23 updated]
1870-Central District-Walther-Over Pulpit Fellowship.pdf -- Fleishmann/Walther -- Full text file HERE: Partial formatted Text file HERE.
1870-Western-Walther, Communion Fellowship with other faiths.pdf  (Translated English in Essays for the Church I, pgs 202-228; and in Walther's Works: Church Fellowship, pgs 145-192; also Theses on Communion Fellowship, tr Laurence L. White 1980) ; German text file HERE.
1872-Missouri-Walther, 25 Years, Not Lose God's Blessings, But Bequeath to Descendents.pdf; [2020-08-21 updated] Full text file HERE. (Sermon by Walther translation here)
1873-Northern-Walther, Theses over conversion.pdf  (Translated English in Essays for the Church I, pgs 244-263); German text file HERE.
1874-Missouri-Walther-Synod sermon-Lutheran Church in New World -p.9-17.pdf; Text file HERE. [2020-08-21: Baseley translation of address HERE]
1874-Western-Walther, Only Lutheran Church - Universal Grace.pdf  (Translated English in Convention Essays, pgs 11-63, abridged) ; German text file HERE.
1877-Western-Walther, Only Lutheran Church - Doctrine of Election (part 1).pdf   (Translated English in Essays for the Church II, pgs 106-148, All Glory to God, pgs. 161-236;  (see English translation of Thesis III in Tappert - Lutheran Conf. Theol. in Am. 1840-1880, pgs 166-191; BTL translation HERE (free); German text file HERE.
1879-Iowa-Walther-Duties of Ev. Luth. Synod.pdf  (Translated English in Essays for the Church II, pgs 6-63;  At Home in the House of My Fathers, pgs 225-330 --  available in phamplet from CPH HERE; and in Walther's Works: Church Fellowship, pgs 237-336; 1976 Concordia Journal July p. 42-43 translated excerpt by Prof. Arnold F. Krugler under title "Loyalty: Confession and Synod"); Text file HERE (German).
1879-Northwestern-Walther, (contd 1877) Means of Grace, Congregation owner of all church powers.pdf    (Google Books scan here) [Note: Walther not present; but President Schwan and Prof. F.A. Schmidt of Norwegian Synod were present; theses were likely
1879-Western-Walther, Only Lutheran Church - Doctrine of Election (part 2).pdf (Translated English in Essays for the Church II, pgs 149-197, All Glory to God, pgs 237-326; BTL translation HERE (free)); Full German text file HERE.
1880-Iowa-Walther, Pieper-Theses on Distinction of Law and Gospel.pdf ; Translated English in Essays for the Church II, pgs 64-65, Theses only; Full German text file HERE.[2020--5-04] : Scanned pages of German original TIF, PDF.
1880-Western-Walther, Only Lutheran Church - Doctrine of Election (part 3).pdf  (Google Books scan here) (Translated English in Essays for the Church II, pgs 198-219; All Glory to God, pgs. 367-412; BTL English translation HERE (free)); Full German text file HERE.
1884-Synodical Conference-Walther, Church Fathers and Doctrine.pdf  (Translated English in Essays for the Church II, pgs 67-101; and in  Walther's Works: Church Fellowship, pgs 351-412); condensed translation in Concordia Journal, October 1988 (by James Ware: "Walther on Sola Scriptura: C F W Walther's 1884 Synodical Conference essay") ; German text file HERE. Google Books here
1885-Iowa-Pieper-Doctrine of certainty of the salvation- importance for spiritual life.pdf  -- Full German text HERE. [Australian pastor may be translating to English soon...]; scanned images PDF HERE , TIF HERE [2020-05-04]
1886-Synodical Conference-Walther present, Divinity of Holy Scripture (Google Doc file) Google Books here (Translated English by Andrew Boomhower here.)

1893-Missouri-Pieper- Our position in doctrine and practice against error and abuse.pdf  (Full German text HERE. -- Original "Brief Statement"; English translation by Kenneth Howes here; or by the LCR in 1971: PDF scan or text file here)
1896-Missouri-Pieper-Church Government.doc -- Scanned copy of original HERE-- PDF file of scanned original HERE. (See Chr. Dogmatics III, pg 432, n. 42 for ref.); 2017-01-28: Another English translation (abridged) here - CLC; DeepL translation here;
              1898-Illinois-Pardieck The Spiritual Priesthood of Christians (Google BooksHathiTrust w text); German text; DeepL English;
1902-Missouri-Pieper- The nature of Christianity..pdf    Pgs 24-39 (Google Books)   German text Google Doc (see J.T. Mueller What Is Christianity and Other Essays ); scanned copies include Pieper's Synodical Address, "All Christians Agree with Us" translated by M. Harrison in At Home in the House of My Fathers, pgs 613-616.
1905-Missouri-Pieper- The Difficult Path of Holding Forth for the Truth.pdf  Full German text HERE -- English transl. by M. Harrison of "Synodalrede", not "Prasidialbericht", in At Home in the House of My Fathers, pgs 628-631.
1907-Minnesota-Dakota,Pieper-The Nature of Justifying Faith   (Google Books scan here) [2026-07-30 updated link]
1912-Synodical Conference-Pieper etc, Sermon on Romans 16-17; Our Relationship to Norwegian Synod, Opgjor, Election.pdf  (Google Books scan here); partially translated in Moving Frontiers, pp 288-290 by W. H. Kohlmeier; the WELS Theologische QuartalSchrift v. 54 (July 1957) reprinted this sermon and, by one report, it may be translated into English by Egbert Schaller, (Mark Braun, Tale of Two Synods, p. 209 fn 41). Translated by Australian Pastor Bryce Winter of the ELCR in 1997 -- file here.
1921-NorthDakota-Montana-Pieper-What do we learn from Luther at Worms.DOC  (Google Books scan here) [2017-07-11: English translation HERE (PDF file) -- from Pastor Bryce L.Winter, ELCR-Australia.]
1923-Missouri Delegate Synod-Pieper- The Christian World-View, see J.T. Mueller What Is Christianity and Other Essays — German text published in Lehre und Wehre >> HERE  <<
1924-Oregon-PieperF-Unionism-Oregon1924.doc – KKM translation [WELS/L. White translation] (2023-01 updated link; German original HERE]
1927-British Columbia - Alberta-Pieper- The Power of the Gospel.pdf – Essay printed in LuW vol. 73, pgs 321-334, 363-369, LuW 74, pgs 40-53, 69-83.; German text file HERE.
1929-Missouri Delegate Synod-Pieper- The Open Heaven (Der offene Himmel), see J.T. Mueller What Is Christianity and Other Essays; German text file HERE, taken from LuW vol. 75, p 196-201.

Appendix – additions
So what use is there for these German resources for our English speaking readers?  They will be a glimpse into the real Missouri Synod, the Missouri Synod from above that had the right Doctrine of Justification and so could properly teach on Christian subjects wide-ranging from Church Government to Church Fathers, from Absolution to Usury.  And it is hoped that they will be a resource for those who thirst for their soul's salvation (like me) and want to translate more of these into English and so get all the wonderful teachings of the fathers of the old (German) Missouri Synod and the Synodical Conference.  Now these resources aren't locked away in some seminary library... not even Google Books has seen fit to scan or make available these old books. [2014-07-30: But now see update in preface above].

Sunday, March 10, 2013

CTS-FW fork in the road – Christology... Not Justification?

I begin this blog with 2 quotes: (1) a quote from Franz Pieper, and (2) a quote from Prof. David P. Scaer promoting the centrality of "Christology" for all Christian theology.
All praise of Christ, of grace, and of the means of grace, without the right doctrine of justification, is nothing.  All teaching in the Church must serve this article. 

– Franz Pieper, essay on C.F.W. Walther as Theologian.


Asserting that all theology is Christology does not remove justification as the central doctrine. On the contrary, Christology is the content of justification and completely informs it: Christology is what the Gospel is all about. Therefore, Christology is what the Bible is all about. 
David P. Scaer,
"All Theology Is Christology" – How Does Every Passage of Scripture Reveal Christ?
in Alliance of Confessing Evangelicals (2002 or 2003?), 
reposted by "Suzee" on The Wittenberg Trail
____________________________________________________________
The two quotes are strikingly different.  Franz Pieper holds up specifically the Doctrine of Justification as the central teaching of all Christianity.  But although Prof. Scaer seemingly attempts to uphold this, yet he immediately creates a "fork in the road" – and so holds out Christology as the real central doctrine of the Bible. 

Which do you believe?  Is Scaer upholding "Justification" or "Christology" as the central article of faith, the article that all other teachings must serve?

Now those who side with Prof. David P. Scaer might protest loudly and say that it is not an "either-or" situation... that Scaer is not downplaying the Doctrine of Justification, but rather upholding it for he says "Christology is the content of Justification" and "Christology informs Justification".  Yes, elsewhere Scaer points out how even Franz Pieper highlighted Christology in his Christian Dogmatics books, chiefly against the false teachings of the Reformed.  Indeed, Pieper devoted over 300 pages to Christology – the union of the divine and human natures in Christ.

But Scaer's assertion that
"all theology is Christology does not remove justification as the central doctrine"
did not hold true for me as God was bringing me back to my old faith.

No!  There was a doctrine that still had to come to me before I could remove all uncertainty of my salvation.  It was the
Doctrine of Justification(i.e. the Gospel)

Specifically, it was the doctrine that
(1) Justification was Universal, and
(2) Justification was Objective (outside of me, before my faith)
In other words Universal, Objective Justification (or UOJ).  These were the central doctrines taught by Franz Pieper.  When God showed me the true doctrine of Justification, I had to admit to God (by faith) –  "No, God, I can't justify myself because You have already done it for all the world, including Judas... including me."  And it is rather the Doctrine of Justification that informs the Doctrine of Christology, not the other way around.  Stay off CTS-FW's "fork in the road" — stay on the true Doctrine of Justification and then you can marvel at the true teachings of Christology that Pieper beautifully brings out.  Then you can marvel at all Christian teachings such as Baptism and The Lord's Supper, Election, etc.

What caused today's (English) LC-MS to get off the track of orthodoxy?  Unionism.  This was dramatically noted by its sister synods in the old Synodical Conference (see my timeline).  But what was the primary doctrine at issue in the change of the old (German) Missouri Synod into today's (English) LC-MS?  Why is today's (English) LC-MS so tongue-tied on the Doctrine of Justification?  Is it because of Fort Wayne's aberration – their "fork in the road", their substitution of "Christology" for Justification as the central article of all Christianity?  Only partially, because...
... because long before,
... it was because the prominent Prof. Theodore Graebner of St. Louis Concordia Seminary could say in 1939 that Walther and Pieper were all wrong on Justification... and not be disciplined.  So much for the "centrality" of Justification in today's (English) LC-MS.  Rather the reader should listen to the Lutheran Confessions and see which doctrine is the real central doctrine of all Christianity and the Bible.  I want to borrow from my blog post "The Lukewarm Lutheran Report" to present the following:

Now read what real confessional Lutherans start with – the Lutheran Doctrine of Justification
(BookOfConcord.org hereTriglotta pg 121, Concordia, the Lutheran Confessions, page 82 – Apology of the Augsburg Confession, Article IV (II),
Of Justification:
But since in this controversy the chief topic of Christian doctrine is treated, which, understood aright, illumines and amplifies the honor of Christ [which is of especial service for the clear, correct understanding of the entire Holy Scriptures, and alone shows the way to the unspeakable treasure and right knowledge of Christ, and alone opens the door to the entire Bible], and brings necessary and most abundant consolation to devout consciences,
__________________________________________________ 



(Not)




Rather, 

All teaching in the Church must serve this article – 
Justification. – Franz Pieper

Monday, March 4, 2013

Walther as Theologian–Justification (by F. Pieper) - Part 10

This post continues from Part 9 and concludes this 10-part series presentation (see Preface for Table of Contents) of Pieper's essay.  It presents the actual text of Wallace McLaughlin's English translation of the essay C.F.W. Walther as Theologian by Franz Pieper.  This is done to honor the two commenters on Concordia Seminary's own web post publishing a different translation.
This portion can be downloaded here.
  • Pieper's text is indented in dark blue text.
  • I will add commentary at certain points in green text.
  • All underlinings are from the original.
  • Highlighting of Pieper's text is mine!
----------------------------------------------------------------
C.F.W. Walther as Theologian 
Justification – Universal, Objective (Second essay)
By Franz Pieper 
(Translated by  Wallace McLaughlin from  “Lehre und Wehre”, February, 1890, pp. 42-50: Justification- Universal),
(Continued from Part 9)
----------------  Pieper  ----------------------------------
            Walther here examines an objection.  The objection asks how this argument concerning complete forgiveness, universal justification, the Gospel as an absolution of the whole world of sinners, harmonizes with those Scripture passages which speak of God’s wrath upon the world lying in wickedness, in particular upon the unbelievers.  Walther answers by means of the distinction between Law and Gospel
----------------- Comments -----------------------------
Objections:
In a past work life, I had to do sales work.  One aspect of sales training was to be able to answer objections by a prospective customer –  the customer has been told the benefits of what you are selling but he has raised in his mind some aspects detrimental to what you are selling.  One website calls these "roadblocks, not dead ends".  So a good salesperson is able to overcome these objections and get the customer to decide for your product or service.  Although the analogy to Walther's teaching here is not exactly the same, for it is impossible for anyone to "decide for Christ" (John 15:16), yet all the Prophets and Apostles worked to overcome our objections to the Gospel.  So how will Walther handle this most pressing objection that we raise in our mind as we read about God's wrath in the Bible?  Indeed, how did Walther establish 
----------------  Pieper  ----------------------------------
In so far as God views the world in Christ “pure love, pure favor, pure grace” toward the world is in His heart.  In so far as He contemplates the world outside of Christ as lying in wickedness, and particularly as rejecting the Gospel, it lies under His wrath.  Although there is indeed no real contradiction here, since grace and wrath are predicated of God’s relation to the world in different respects, yet “an unutterable and unfathomable mystery” is to be acknowledged here.  Since Scripture teaches both facts we let them stand side by side.  “It is the Lutheran way that when we find in God’s Word two things which we are not able to harmonize we let both stand and believe both as they read.” (Synodical Conference, 1st Report, pp. 31 f, 36 f.) [SCR1872S.PDF, 1872: pg 177, col. 3; pg 178, col. 2-3]                    ---Franz Pieper 
– Translated by W.H.M.
----------------- Comments -----------------------------
As one reads many of Walther's sermons, you find that his preaching of the Law kills you... spiritually.  There is no hint of Antinomianism or avoidance of preaching the Law.  All listeners will hear that they are indeed sinners worthy of nothing but damnation.  Ah, but Walther is an "able minister of the new testament":
2 Cor. 3:6 – Who also hath made us able ministers of the new testament; not of the letter, but of the spirit: for the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life.
It is the pure Gospel message that sets C.F.W. Walther apart.  His sermons are filled with the Spirit, the spirit that "giveth life".  Would to God all Lutheran pastors of today would become "able ministers of the new testament" and learn from Walther!
1 Cor. 15:57 – But thanks be to God, which giveth us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ.
-------------------------------------------

God did bless America!  He sent C.F.W. Walther... and Franz Pieper!

Walther as Theologian–Justification (by F. Pieper) - Part 9

This post continues a 10-part series (see Preface for Table of Contents) from Part 8 which presents the actual text of Wallace McLaughlin's English translation of the essay C.F.W. Walther as Theologian by Franz Pieper.  This is done to honor the two commenters on Concordia Seminary's own web post publishing a different translation.
This portion can be downloaded here.
  • Pieper's text is indented in dark blue text.
  • I will add commentary at certain points in green text.
  • All underlinings are from the original.
  • Highlighting of Pieper's text is mine!
----------------------------------------------------------------
C.F.W. Walther as Theologian 
Justification – Universal, Objective (Second essay)
By Franz Pieper 
(Translated by  Wallace McLaughlin from  “Lehre und Wehre”, February, 1890, pp. 42-50: Justification- Universal),
(Continued from Part 8)
---------------  Pieper  --------------------------------
            Particularly in connection with Walther’s discussions on absolution, that is, the “preaching of the Gospel to one or more particular persons who desire the comfort of the Gospel”, the manner in which the complete redemption of all men through Christ lived in Walther’s heart came to expression.  Absolution, says Walther, is based upon the perfect redemption or universal justification.  “When the pastor absolves he distributes a treasure which is already at hand, namely the forgiveness of sins which has already been gained”. (L.c., p. 43.)   [SCR1872S.PDF, 1872: pg 185, col. 1] Walther holds only that man to be a true Lutheran preacher who holds that he by speaking the absolution has absolved all the penitents and only that man to be a true Lutheran Christian who believes that through the absolution of the pastor he has truly been absolved by God.  He adds: “Only he indeed can believe thus who believes that the world is redeemed; for if I believe that, then the absolution is only the communication to the penitents of the fact that they were redeemed 1800 (1900-)  [2000-] years ago, and the plea: Only believe that and you are saved”. [See also SCR1872S.PDF, 1873: pg 2, col. 1 – "Thesis 8"]  That so many take offense at the absolution which is customary in the Lutheran Church comes from the fact that they do not believe in the complete redemption of all men through Christ and hence suppose that we ascribe to the preachers as “ordained persons” a special authority and mysterious power.  “But we say: It is no art to absolve someone; that any ordinary Christian man, any woman, any child can do, if it can only tell that the Lord Jesus died for all, and that whoever believes in Him receives the forgiveness of sins.  For the absolution depends not upon the quality of the speaker but upon the word of the Gospel concerning the accomplished redemption”.
            In this connection Walther insists again and again that one must not make the essence of the Gospel dependent upon faith, but is to regard it as an offer of God’s grace which is valid of itself. 
----------------- Comments -----------------------------
As Walther insisted "again and again" (usque ad nauseam) on this teaching, I want to repeat this statement in the face of the whole world, and especially to those "Lutherans" who make faith a condition (i.e. a work of ours) upon which the Gospel (and our Justification) is dependent:
"...Walther insists again and again that one must not make the essence of the Gospel dependent upon faith, but is to regard it as an offer of God’s grace which is valid of itself."  —  C.F.W. Walther (and Franz Pieper)
This is where the old Ohio Synod left the orthodoxy of the Synodical Conference.  They removed themselves from the Synodical Conference and are now lost somewhere in today's ELCA, the so-called "the largest Lutheran denomination in the United States".
----------------  Pieper  ----------------------------------
“The glorious benefits of Christ have been given us; mark well! They have already been given us (in the Gospel) and indeed they are always at hand for us, even if we do not believe”.  (Western District, 1874, p. 47.) [Convention Essays, pg 79; also new CPH book here.]  If one makes the Gospel essentially dependent upon a man’s believing, or, which is the same, if one talks as though faith must first be there before the Gospel is in itself valid and effective or before the benefit of the forgiveness of sins is at hand for the sinner, he thereby both denies Christ’s all-sufficient merit, the redemption and reconciliation of the world, and then also faith is thereby made something quite different from what it properly is; it is then no more a grasping and receiving of the present forgiveness, but a work which must be furnished in order that there may be forgiveness in the Gospel; finally, faith has then simply nothing on which it can take hold.  “If the Gospel is not valid unless a man first believe it, what then shall he believer?”  Faith thus comes to be founded on itself instead of on the Gospel.  “That amounts to increasing the distress of people who are in anxiety and doubt concerning their salvation”. (L.c., pp. 57-64.)  [SCR1872S.PDF, 1873: pg 2, col. 1 to pg 3, col. 1, "Thesis 8"] Walther reminds us again and again that, with a doctrine or practice according to which faith is first demanded in order that forgiveness of sins may be there, no tempted person can be comforted.  “The tempted supposes that he cannot believe.  Such a person must despair with this doctrine, whereas one should seek to convince him that the Savior is already there for him, has already forgiven him and will receive him”. (Western District, 1875, p. 38.)  [Convention Essays, pgs 110; see also my blog post here].
----------------- Comments -----------------------------
"Anxiety", "doubt", "distress"... words that today's so-called "Christian Counseling" attempts to alleviate with its nice sounding words such as "get in touch with your feelings", or "think positive", "feel good about yourself", etc., etc.  Even Lutherans attempt to follow the sects with programs like "Doxology". But these all fall short of God's counsel of an existing forgiveness for all.  If this counsel is not believed, then there is no human counsel left... unbelief leaves a person in anxiety, doubt, and distress.  Ah, but with true faith, now the believer is comforted not by a human, but by God himself... the believer can "Taste and see that the Lord is good". Psalm 34:8
-------------------------------------------

The next Part 10 presents the final portion of Pieper's essay dealing with an Objection – What about God's wrath?

Sunday, March 3, 2013

Walther as Theologian–Justification (by F. Pieper) - Part 8

This post continues a 10-part series (see Preface for Table of Contents) from Part 7 which presents the actual text of Wallace McLaughlin's English translation of the essay C.F.W. Walther as Theologian by Franz Pieper.  This is done to honor the two commenters on Concordia Seminary's own web post publishing a different translation.
This portion can be downloaded here.
  • Pieper's text is indented in dark blue text.
  • I will add commentary at certain points in green text.
  • All underlinings are from the original.
  • Highlighting of Pieper's text is mine!
----------------------------------------------------------------
C.F.W. Walther as Theologian 
Justification – Universal, Objective (Second essay)
By Franz Pieper 
(Translated by  Wallace McLaughlin from  “Lehre und Wehre”, February, 1890, pp. 42-50: Justification- Universal),
(Continued from Part 7)
---------------  Pieper  --------------------------------
Many, even among preachers, do not rightly know what to do with the resurrection of Christ.  They read that Christ raised Himself and then again that the Father raised Him, and they do not know how to harmonize this.  They suppose at one time that Christ arose in order to prove His deity and at another that He was raised in order that the possibility and certainty of our resurrection might be established.  True as both these assertions are, yet neither one is the chief matter
----------------- Comments -----------------------------
Yes, dear Walther, please tell us what the chief matter is for all Christianity...  what does Easter really mean?  I'm pretty sure it is not about chocolate Easter bunnies sold in stores, but what is it?  Why should I be happy at the message of Easter?
----------------  Pieper  ----------------------------------
Christ would not have died and risen again only to prove His deity; and the possibility of our resurrection had indeed already been proven by the resurrection of others before Christ; the chief matter remains that God through Christ declared: Christ has now paid for the sins of the whole world, it is therefore free from its guilt; now the entire world can raise the shout of victory, for its freedom from sin and its righteousness is won.  Furthermore: when God raised His son from the dead He did not forgive Him His own sin but that of all mankind which He had taken upon Him; He did not justify Christ from His own guilt but from our guilt which He had allowed to be imputed unto Him.  Thus the whole world has been justified through the resurrection of Christ. (Western District, 1875, p. 33.)  [Convention Essays, pgs 105 - 106; see also my blog posts beginning here]. 
----------------- Comments -----------------------------
Dear God!  Thank you for sending C.F.W. Walther to bring again the chief matter for all Christianity to our modern world!
This is the Lutheran Doctrine of Justification!
It seems that President Matthew Harrison, in his Easter video at Pieper's church building and grave site, attempted to capture the spirit of Pieper.  He mentions the Bible verse Romans 4:25, he says that "because He is risen, our sins are forgiven."  These are good statements!  But he spends the majority of time on Christ the Pantocrator and on eschatological matters (last things) that Pieper only spends a few paragraphs at the end of his Christian Dogmatics book.  Now these are also fine doctrines to teach the people, but has he given any teaching of the Law to show our sins (S.O.S.) and has he driven home what most people don't believe or struggle with —  Are my sins really forgiven?  Harrison's message seems wanting...  Someone might say I'm being too harsh on President Harrison...  perhaps.  But I'm one step from hell, and without the assurance of universal justification, mere talk of "last things", a favorite subject of Pentecostals, leaves me a bit empty.
----------------  Pieper  ----------------------------------
With this, the fact that man is justified by faith in no way stands in contradiction,...
----------------- Comments -----------------------------
   Here is exactly where some who think of themselves as "conservative" Lutherans, as great champions of Luther and Lutheran Orthodoxy, fall miserably.  They attack this beautiful doctrine vehemently (which I call UOJ or Universal, Objective Justification) by claiming this doctrine destroys the great cry of the Reformation – "Justification by Faith!".  But they are sadly mistaken and drive many away from Christianity.  For me, 15 years ago, it was Larry Darby.  Today, "GJ" is perhaps the chief spokesman of their error.
   Even the former members of the Synodical Conference – the LC-MS, WELS, and ELS – are all unsure of this basic doctrine...  and certainly do not teach and preach it as in their former days.
   But let us go on to the ultimate winsome teaching the world will ever hear... from the pen of Walther (and Pieper).
----------------  Pieper  ----------------------------------
... for when we speak of faith, the personal appropriation on the part of man and the imputation of the righteousness which has been won on the part of God is emphasized.  But this would not be possible if the world had not been first justified through Christ’s death and resurrection, if the condemnation in death had not been followed by the acquittal in the resurrection. (1st Report of the Synodical Conference, p. 41 f.).  [SCR1872S.PDF, 1872: pg 179, col. 2 - 3]

 And this justification applies not only to men in general but to all individual men.  “If it be asked whether one could say that man collectively has indeed been absolved but not the individuals, our answer is: God through Christ is reconciled to each individual. (L.c., p. 32.)  [SCR1872S.PDF, 1872: pg 178, col. 1]

            This doctrine of a universal justification of all men before faith is not a theological construction, but a Biblical doctrine
----------------- Comments -----------------------------
This is why I had to write against Larry Darby,  this was the exact phraseology he used – that the Doctrine of Universal, Objective Justification was a "theological construction".   
----------------  Pieper  ----------------------------------
Biblical not only in its content- which in itself would be fully sufficient, -- but even in its phraseology.  “It is this doctrine,” says Walther, “which is expressly declared in the passage, Romans 5:18 (‘As the offense of one judgment came upon all men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of One the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life’), and it is therefore not merely a Biblical doctrine but also a Biblical expression that justification of life has come upon all men.  Only a Calvinistic exegesis could explain this passage to the effect that only the elect are justified”.  Although Scripture is most places speaks of that justification which takes place in the moment when a man comes to faith, and accordingly in ecclesiastical usage the justification by faith is simply called the justification of a poor sinner (L.c., p. 68.) [SCR1872S.PDF, 1874: pg 11, col. 3] , nevertheless the doctrine of the universal justification of all men before faith, which is clearly attested by Scripture in several places, is of the very greatest importance.  Let no one think in this matter a mere strife of words is involved.  Rather is the most highly important matter here to be maintained against attacks and error.  Especially in this land of sects and fanatics we must earnestly urge the doctrine of universal justification, for they indeed also teach that man is justified by faith, but they speak of faith in such a manner that one soon notices that they make faith itself the effective cause of justification, whereby they rob the Lord Christ of His honor. (L.c., p. 46.) [SCR1872S.PDF, 1872: pg 186, col. 1] Without the universal justification before faith there is no justification by faith.  We could not then, continues Walther, speak of the justification of the sinner by faith, for to believe means to receive what is there.  If the world were not already justified, then believing would mean accomplishing a work unto justification.  The entire preaching of the Gospel is a message of God concerning a righteousness which has already been gained by Him and is there for all.  (Cf. On this subject especially Brosamen, pp. 142, 143.) [The Word of His Grace – Sermon Selections, pgs 232-233 (see also Amazon here); From Our Master's Table, pgs 72-73]
            Those who say that God has made the whole world righteous, but has not declared it righteous thereby really deny the whole of justification.  Yea, if God had not (already) written and sealed the document of pardon, we preachers would be liars and deceivers of the people when we tell them: Only believe and your are righteous;  but now that God through raising His Son has subscribed the document of pardon for the sinners and provided it with His divine seal, we can confidently preach: the world is justified, the world is reconciled to God, which latter expression we could not use if the former were not true. – When the Lutheran Confession repeatedly says that justification is grasped by faith these passages express the truth that a justification must first be at hand which faith can receive, and that faith must not first effect it, but that it grasps it as already at hand.  If anyone would say: the forgiveness of sins is indeed already there, but not justification, he must indeed be ignorant of our Confessions, which expressly teach that justification and forgiveness of sins are the same.  “We believe, teach, and confess that according to the usage of Holy Scripture the word justify means in this article, to absolve, that is, to declare free from sins”. (Formula of Concord, Article 3; Mueller, p. 528; Triglotta p. 793. L.c., p.46.)  [SCR1872S.PDF, 1872: pg 185, col. 3; Concordia – The Lutheran Confessions, pg 480] 
----------------- Comments -----------------------------
Grab a chair.  Sit at the feet of the greatest Christian teacher since the days of Martin Luther.  Bask in the "luminous rays of the Gospel".  Listen to the greatest "helper of Joy" for our modern Christian era.
Believe what God has already done for you... there is nothing left to do to appease Him, only believe that Christ has paid the debt of our sin to the uttermost.
-------------------------------------------

In the next Part 9, Absolution and true Christian counsel are covered.

Saturday, March 2, 2013

Walther as Theologian–Justification (by F. Pieper) - Part 7

This post continues a 10-part series (see Preface for Table of Contents) from Part 6 which presents the actual text of Wallace McLaughlin's English translation of the essay C.F.W. Walther as Theologian by Franz Pieper.  This is done to honor the two commenters on Concordia Seminary's own web post publishing a different translation.
This portion can be downloaded here.
  • Pieper's text is indented in dark blue text.
  • I will add commentary at certain points in green text.
  • All underlinings are from the original.
  • Highlighting of Pieper's text is mine!
----------------------------------------------------------------
C.F.W. Walther as Theologian 
Justification – Universal, Objective (Second essay)
By Franz Pieper 
(Translated by  Wallace McLaughlin from  “Lehre und Wehre”, February, 1890, pp. 42-50: Justification- Universal),
(Continued from Part 6)
---------------  Pieper  --------------------------------
            Only when the complete redemption is thus held fast will the concept of the Gospel also be held fast.  Why is Christ’s doctrine called Gospel or good news?  Simply because when I preach the Gospel I preach nothing else than what has already been obtained and bestowed upon men and what they should therefore receive and in which they should heartily rejoice.  The Gospel is the joyful tidings that Christ has done the work which we should have done and yet could not do, and that the heavenly Father by raising our Redeemer from the dead has given a sign from heaven that He is fully satisfied.  (L.c., p.39.) [SCR1872S.PDF, 1872: pg 178, col. 3 to pg 179, col. 1] 
----------------- Comments -----------------------------
With Walther (and Pieper), I can: 
Taste and see that the Lord is good.  Psalm 34:8
With Walther and Pieper, I can believe that the Gospel is indeed Good News! and that
God so loved the world...  John 3:16 
 ----------------  Pieper  ----------------------------------
In the Gospel the peace which God has made with men is proclaimed.  (Western District 1868, p. 31). [Essays For The Church, Vol. 1, page 168]  It must be stressed with earnestness that God’s wrath is turned away from all men by the work of Christ and that through the Gospel everyone is invited to partake of grace.  If a preacher had to come before his hearers with the thought: the wrath of God is still resting upon them and they must be induced to appease Him—that would be terrible; but because he knows that the atonement has already been rendered for all and God’s wrath against all has been quenched, therefore he can say confidently: Be ye reconciled to God, do but receive His hand of grace! (1st Report of Synodical Conference, p. 36.) [SCR1872S.PDF, 1872: pg 178, col. 2]
 He who will not preach the Gospel thus might as well preach the Koran or the Talmud or the papal decretals or what he will;  but if he wishes to (preach the Gospel and) make happy Christians, then let him preach this good news. (L.c., p. 39.) [SCR1872S.PDF, 1872: pg 178, col. 3]
----------------- Comments -----------------------------
Walther... surely you don't mean that all those "Protestant" sects who claim Christianity, who even have Lutheran theologians working with them, are preaching nothing better than the Jews, the Turks/Islam, or the Pope?  Surely, Walther you are being too harsh on them... aren't they Christian teachers? ...  
... or are you rather giving us the Good News straight?
----------------  Pieper  ----------------------------------
 And again: “Since all men are reconciled to God, and the Gospel is the tidings of this reconciliation, therefore it is such an unutterable grace to live under the sound of the Gospel”.  The fanatics indeed have such thoughts concerning Christ’s work that they regard Him as having only made it possible for man to attain grace by his own efforts.  It is likewise the papistical teaching that men through contrition, penance, and other good works can secure for himself the salvation which Christ has made possible.  But thereby the Gospel, the preaching of which Christ has committed His Church, is denied.

            To the Scriptural presentation of the complete redemption as a premise for the correct doctrine of justification belongs, according to Walther, also the doctrine that in Christ’s death and resurrection a justification of the entire world of sinners is already implied.  “As by the vicarious death of Christ”, says Walther, “the guilt of the entire world was cancelled and its punishment suffered, so also by the resurrection of Christ righteousness, life, and salvation is restored for the entire world and in Christ, as the Substitute of all mankind, has come upon all men”.  “Christ’s glorious resurrection from the dead is the actual absolution of the entire world of sinners”, and “The resurrection of Christ the plenary justification of all men”: such are the themes of Easter sermons delivered by Walther.  (Brosamen, p. 138; [From our Master's Table, pg 70; The Word of His Grace, pg 229],  Epistelpostille, p. 211; [Standard Epistles, Donald.E. Heck, Livermore, Iowa, pg xxx; see also Gospel Sermons, CPH to be released 2013 & 2014] ). 
----------------- Comments -----------------------------
==>> Note to James Swan, the great Internet site for Martin Luther (yet from a Reformed view):
Do you believe that this was the message of Luther?  Perhaps if you would study this doctrine you will know why I say that you will never understand Luther without this doctrine. (Romans 5:18, 2 Cor. 5:19, John 3:16, John 1:29)  This is the doctrine that brought me back to the Christian faith and this is the doctrine where you will fully understand Luther.  The world does not believe it...  and knows nothing of Luther.  Yes, even Lutherans are stumbling terribly on this doctrine (the Gospel), especially when some of their theologians want to stand with the Reformed, so-called "Evangelical" sects...
   The season of Lent is upon us as we approach the greatest Christian celebration of ... Easter.  But the world knows absolutely nothing of Easter... except the true Christians, those who believe as Walther teaches here.

Here I sit!  ... at the feet of C.F.W. Walther!  Here I sit, as I ponder the pearl of great price (Matt. 13:46), the multi-faceted diamond of the Doctrine of Justification.  Would that all Christianity would sit beside me...
-----------------------------------------------

A most happy news item to report!  I just discovered that CPH is going to re-publish the Gospel Sermons of Walther (see above bold text).  I notice they have just applied for a copyright this year.  They evidently are going to use the translation of long ago (1960s) by Donald E. Heck of Livermore, Iowa and reprinted in 1984 by Concordia Theological Seminary Press.  It was only sold in the Fort Wayne seminary bookstore, not by CPH... until this issue comes out.  CPH is to be commended for picking this up.  It is my fervent hope that they will also reprint Walther's Standard Epistles by the same Donald E. Heck.

Note to President Matthew Harrison – have Walther's Easter sermons reprinted in the Lutheran Witness this Easter season.  I believe perhaps the best is the one from the book The Word of His Grace.  Then your problems will begin to go away... you will not have to apologize for anything.  Then God will be with you...

The next Part 8 continues with the greatest teaching the modern world has ever seen since the days of Martin Luther and Martin Chemnitz – the true teaching of Easter.