Search This Blog

Monday, November 30, 2020

Balt2: “Red flag—bloody rule”; Greatest WWI Heroes

      This continues from Part 1 (Table of Contents in Part 1), a series presenting information on the Communist persecution of Lutherans in the Baltic countries in the early decades of the 20th century. — In this installment, the conclusion of Bente's book review of Pastor Oskar Schabert's 1921 book Martyrs. The Suffering of the Baltic Christians. — In this segment we read of the Communists' hatred of the Bible and their attempt to strip prisoner Schabert of his New Testament.  It is a moving account and it reminded me of a more recent Russian Christian (Greek Orthodox), Alexander Ogorodnikov, who related a similar account for himself from 1977.  I quote a few lines from the Prologue of his 2013 book Dissident for Life: Alexander Ogorodnikov and the Struggle for Religious Freedom in Russia (Amazon) (page 1-2) which relates his own experience with the Communists in 1977 (all emphases are mine):  
Cover of: Dissident for Life: Alexander Ogorodnikov and the Struggle for Religious Freedom in Russia
     He expected to be shot in the back at any moment, but it didn’t happen. The men came up behind him and encircled him again. Roughly pushing Ogorodnikov along, the men discussed what they were going to do with the body later on.
      “Do we torture him first?” one of them asked.
      “We’ll start when we get there,” said another.
      “Where do you want to shoot him?” asked a third. Ogorodnikov stumbled on a bit farther, and then someone shouted, “Kneel!”
      “I kneel only to God,” Ogorodnikov answered.
      The man discharged a few shots over his head, and he snarled, We don’t want any new martyrs!
      Suddenly, Ogorodnikov saw a side path and turned into it.…
      By morning, Tatiana’s apartment was surrounded by KGB agents on all sides. Nonetheless, Ogorodnikov left the building — with a couple of agents close on his tail. In an attempt to shake them off, he hurried to the inner courtyard of a block of flats. Panicking, he pushed his shoulder against a door and, luckily, it opened. He ran up the stairs to the highest floor, expecting to be arrested at any moment. Out of breath, he opened the small New Testament he had with him. His eyes fell on verse 14 of the second chapter of the First Epistle of John [1 John 2:14]: “I write to you, young men, because you are strong, and the word of God abides in you, and you have overcome the evil one.”
      A sense of peace suddenly fell over him. Ogorodnikov kissed the New Testament and returned it to his back pocket. The minutes ticked by, but there were no footsteps to be heard. He descended the stairs with caution, and once he got to the courtyard, there was no one to be seen. The agents had disappeared without a trace. He was free again — at least for now.
Worldly historians will describe this account by saying that Ogorodnikov was lucky, or even that the story is a fabrication.  But Christians know differently, for he set his eyes on Jesus, that is, the Word of God, and took comfort there.  —  Now we are prepared for the strikingly similar account, from 60 years earlier, of Pastor Oskar Schabert, a Lutheran pastor. What an honor for me to present these two accounts!
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
Excerpt from Lehre und Wehre vol. 67 (July 1921) p. 209-211; translation by BackToLuther, highlightinghyperlinks, and red text in square brackets [ ] are mine, German original text file here.
- - - - - - - - - - -  Continued from Part 1  - - - - - - - - - - -
Prison in 1903 Russia (Wikipedia, Gulag)
Schabert writes: 

“All prisons [BBC - Siberian prisons; Gulag-Wikipedia] were overcrowded. Probably 4000 men were in prison, and pastors were found everywhere. I cannot describe how they all fared. … The hardest hour I experienced was not the rough treatment in prison, not the mean work we were forced to do, such as: the cleaning of the septic tanks (when typhus and other epidemics were rife), the driving of manure carts in the city, the thrusts and swear words, which I, like every other one of my comrades, got to taste in abundance, but the hardest thing was when, after the most shameless body inspection, the prison administration, consisting of nothing but depraved, wanted to take away my New Testament, which I had always been used to carrying in my skirt pocket. [like Ogorodnikov] It was especially valuable to me, since it had accompanied me to Siberia, since I had held many hundreds of Bible lessons from it. Now it was to be taken away from me, because the prison is a state building, and in a state building nothing religious, therefore no New Testament may be found, which in addition in its readers only produces the ‘known religious madness’. I resisted, explaining that I would not let go of my New Testament, for I lived by it. There was such a flood of satanic, mean mockery of the Word of God that I trembled all over my body. God gave me the strength to respond calmly and firmly to all the insults, so that finally the degenerate boss got bored and he threw my New Testament at me with contempt. So I moved with my New Testament, arm in arm with a dear brother in office, in a dark night on March 4, 1919, from custody to the actual prison with the prayer request of Psalm 121 [Psalms 121:8]: God bless “thy going out and thy coming in”! In the dark, unheated cell we entered, we prayed Col. 4:3: “that God would open unto us a door of utterance, to speak the mystery of Christ, for which I am also in bonds.” It is wonderful how God has opened the door for us. Not only was I allowed to speak of the mystery of Christ in my own cell in front of my sixteen fellow prisoners every morning and evening, but there were also days when I was allowed to preach the Gospel in four other cells. [cp. Bonhoeffer on Isaiah just before his execution] What profound hours in the presence of God were these! There were always some among the listeners who were doomed to die! What a hunger for divine words was everywhere! How often did the request come: “Please try to sneak into our cell to pray with us! And in many cells other men prayed with their comrades. There was hardly a cell where they did not pray regularly. Men who had not learned to pray, here they learned and vowed not to unlearn it. And as the men, so the women.” (p. 33 f.) [How many became Christians in Siberia?!]

Schabert thus continues:

Red Flag of Communism (Wikipedia - Communism)

Bolshevism [i.e. Communism] became a murderer everywhere, in Moscow as in Petersburg, in Munich as in Ofen-Pest [Hungarian: Buda-Pest?]; in the Baltic countries they became a mass murderer. In the five months of their reign they carried out 3,654 death sentences in Riga [capital of Latvia]; how many in the whole of the Baltic region cannot yet be determined. Red was their flag, bloody was their rule. Without law and justice, mostly without interrogation, the death sentences were carried out according to a revolutionary conscience. When 30 were sentenced to death and only 27 of them were found in the prisons, because in the prevailing disorder one did not know where the three missing prisoners were locked up, three prisoners of any other kind were taken and shot, because ‘thirty had to be shot’. The number of direct executions goes into the thousands, in Riga, as I said, 3,654; in Wesenberg [now Rakvere], a country town in Estonia, 300 at one time; in Dorpat [now Tartu], in the dreadful ‘murder cellar,’ 150 found death in one night, etc. Innumerable were shot during transport because of ‘suspicion of escape’ and even without the suspicion of escape. Of the men, women, children, and old people, driven as hostages from Mitau [now Jelgave] to Riga in the dark night on the slippery, 45-kilometer-long highway, arrived alive in Riga; the others, as soon as they fell or slipped from tiredness, were shot by the executioners who were sitting on horseback and chasing them. 215 found their deaths on this Via Dolorosa [Latin for "Sorrowful Way"]. Next to the bullet, the spotted typhus cleaned up terribly among those interned in the prison. The Bolsheviks made the prisoners starve and freeze, often even preventing relatives from bringing food to the prisoners: ‘What then is the harm if “Burschuis” [citizens] die? They do not need to be shot to death then.’ Of course they did nothing for hygiene. The vermin, especially the lice, these carriers of typhus, were countless. Warm water for washing the body — to say nothing of a bath [page 211] — was given to the detainees once every two weeks. There was no medication. Those who were infected were almost certainly doomed to death. The heart was weakened by dropsy [or Edema] caused by starvation, camphor was not available or was not given; so the heart could not withstand the fever. Thus tens of thousands became victims of the satanic Bolshevik rule.” (p. 37 f.) 

“The murdered were probably all martyrs of justice, for they were judged without any moral guilt, having been condemned mostly without interrogation, on false pretences. Some were also martyrs of truth, which they testified to by their word against the Communists. But many were also martyrs of Christ, who suffered for His sake because they could not refrain from testifying to Him, above all the pastors, who through their ministry must come forward with such testimony”. (p. 45) 

Lutheran Martyrs: Hahn, Eckhardt, Hesse, Paucker, Wachsmuth, Grüner, Wühner
Hahn    —     Eckhardt   —   Hesse  —   Paucker   —   Wachsmuth   —   Grüner   —   Wühner

Baltic "Martyr's Stone": de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rigaer_M%C3%A4rtyrerstein

Among the latter, whose martyrdom Schabert also briefly describes, belong Prof. Dr. [Traugott] Hahn, pastor of the university parish in Dorpat; Provost [August] Eckhardt of Riga; the Estonian Pastors [Karl Immanuel] Hesse, [Walther] Paucker in Wesenberg, [Paul] Wachtsmuth [or Wachsmuth], [Wilhelm] Grüner [or Vilhelms Grīners], and [Richard] Wühner. [Images: Schabert, Bildnisse] These and other names of Baltic pastors, who were honored to praise the Lord with their witness unto death, are found written on the “Martyr's Stone[more images and here, 🔗, list w/ links], which was unveiled on May 22, 1920, from the old Riga cemetery, the resting place of many witnesses. Many church members also died as witnesses of truth. Schabert says: 

“Who can name all those who, among the many who were executed, praised Christ unto death? … All those who stood in such suffering humbly testify that they would never want to cut this great time out of their lives for the sake of their great inner gain.” (p. 56) 

“At a time when even the best are almost despondent as to whether the Gospel still has a world-overcoming power in it, God lets these heroes of faith arise before us, so that we may align our weak faith with them: Behold, these are Christians, who have overcome by the blood of the Lamb!” (p. 60)  

Friedrich Bente, editor of book reviews, Lehre und Wehre

These Baltic martyrs belong without doubt to the noblest figures and greatest heroes of the World War [WWI]. From them one can also draw on as evidence against the cries of the enemies of the bankruptcy of Christianity. Christ still reigns, and as long as He does not succumb, even the gates of hell will not be able to overcome His kingdom. May the martyrdom of the Balts also bear this fruit, that they resist all modernism and in all points remain with the old doctrines of Luther, or rather return to them!   F. B.  [Friedrich Bente]

= = = = = = = = = = = End of book review = = = = = = = = = =

To the “Balts” of today: 
Bente's final words are good counsel for all of us:  Stay with Luther.  If you find that you have strayed, as is common in today's world, go Back To Luther.  There is where your heritage is.  Go back to Luther, who pointed us to the pure Word and the pure Evangelical Gospel!  Balts!… your glorious martyrs testify of this.—
      This topic became too important to leave it without presenting more translations of Pastor Oskar Schabert writings.  In the next Part 3, we publish an earlier writing from 1919 giving more details of the Baltic Christians during the time of Communist revolutions.

Saturday, November 28, 2020

Baltic Christian Martyrs of Communism: Bente 1921 book review; Part 1 of 6

      I have presented a blog series before, from Pastor C. J. Hermann Fick's books, about the Lutheran martyrs during Reformation times and benefited greatly.  That series is one of my more popular blog series.  I recently ran across a book review in the 1921 Lehre und Wehre theological periodical that speaks of martyrs of more modern times, albeit about 100 years ago.  These were associated with the Communist / Bolshevik Revolution in Russia starting in 1917.  This is an example of what C.F.W. Walther taught about Communism in his 1878 lectures.
Pastor Oskar Schabert (1866-1936) (image from Stephan Bitter essay)
Pastor Oskar Schabert
     Friedrich Bente, the book reviews editor, devoted space to a book by a certain Pastor Oskar Schabert (1866-1936) (Image here).  There have been a number of books written by Schabert on this subject when one searches WorldCat today, but this book review will suffice to get the general idea of those who suffered during this time. (NB: WorldCat listings sometimes show his name as "Otto".)  Behind the face of the man picture at right, with the stern looking image, is a Christian man who withstood all the Communists persecutions and was spared by the Lord, when others were not, so that he could testify to what actually happened in and outside of the Communist prison.  When I look at that stern face, I now see one who would fight unto death for the Lord, and against the Communists.
      What I learned from this book review opened up a flood of information surrounding these unsettled times of about 100 years ago.  My parents housed a Latvian family in our upstairs farm house when I was quite young. They then moved to Michigan, and so I don't remember very much about them, other than that there was a time in their people's history of some kind of persecution.  This book and Bente's book review fill in the details for Americans who are far removed from the events described therein. Or… are we not so far removed in this watershed year of 2020?
      Much of this book review quotes either the publisher or Schabert, so I have indented these quotes so that the reader can pick out Bente's own comments by the un-indented portions.  I was most interested in an old Missouri Synod theologian's comments about these martyrs, and Bente does not disappoint.  He gives the best brief sketch of the background  of Lutheranism in the Baltics, from the time of the Reformation leading up to more modern times. — All Christians will be interested in these accounts of Bente and Schabert.  The story of the martyrs brings out the greatest anger in the enemies of Christianity.
      I am splitting this book review into 2 parts because of its length.  I am appending two more parts, Parts 3 and 4, to offer even more narrative translations of other works by Pastor Schabert who is the greatest chronicler of that region of the world for those times of great persecution at the hands of the Communists/Bolsheviks.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
Excerpt from Lehre und Wehre vol. 67 (July 1921)  p. 209-211; translation by BackToLuther, highlighting, hyperlinks, and red text in square brackets [ ] are mine, German original text file here.


Literature.

Martyrs. The Suffering of the Baltic Christians. By Pastor O. Schabert, St. Gertrude's Church, Riga. Agency of the Rauhen Haus, Hamburg 26. 77 pages. M.4.

Baltic Countries: Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania (image: nationsonline.org)

“The martyrdom of the Baltic Christians is portrayed in a deeply moving manner by an eyewitness who himself was tried and tested in martyrdom. A warning sign for us Germans! [And us Americans!] A gem of rare value in form and content”, 

is how the publisher characterizes this booklet. In a review we read: 

“We have martyrs again in the midst of the old ‘Christianity’, Evangelical-Lutheran martyrs, in the 20th century. This realization awakens Psalms of praise in our hearts when we read Shabert's writing, in the midst of the shivering over the nameless sufferings that have befallen our brothers and sisters on the Baltic Sea shore. Despite the great apostasy of Western Christianity, there is still a Christianity that stands not in words but in power, and our beloved Lutheran Church has been honored to reveal such power.” 

In short, powerful lines the author describes how Lutheranism gained a firm foothold in the Baltic countries a few years after the posting of the theses [Luther’s 95 Theses], first among the Germans, but then also among the Latvians and Estonians. In one generation the arch-Catholic country had become Evangelical. But when it became a robbery by the Poles, the first persecution by the Jesuits began, who sought to eradicate, by root and branch, the “cursed Lutheran heresy” from the old “Land of Mary”. A few congregations fell away, but most of them declared with H. Samson: “We want to stay with the pure word of God as long as there is still a breath in us.”  

Gustavus Adolphus

Gustavus Adolphus [of Sweden] brought freedom to the Baltics in 1620, but in 1721 they came under the forced rule of the Russians. Apostasy from the Russian state church and the admission of apostates to the Lutheran Church were punished as criminal offenses, while “orthodox” propaganda among the Lutherans was zealously pursued and promoted by the state. But woe to the Lutheran pastors who welcomed back repentant apostate Lutherans! Schabert writes: 

Whether absolutist tsarism, whether constitutional monarchy, whether democratic-socialist republic, whether Bolshevism reigns, however different they find, they find one thing in the pursuit of the Gospel.” [now American democracy? 

Konstantin Pobedonostsev, advisor to 3 Russian tsars

Under [Konstantin] Pobedonostsev the persecution of tsarism reached its peak. England also had its hand in this. Schabert remarks: 

“It is now clear from the records that the leading [Russian] newspaper Novoye Vremya worked with English money, envying everything German and Evangelical. The slanders had their effect. This was clearly shown at the outbreak of the world war.” 

But the persecutions under the tsars had not harmed the Lutheran Church. Before the war, Livonia had 144, Courland 103 [western Latvia], Estonia 56 parishes with about 300 pastors and 2,000,000 Evangelicals. The most serious suffering was caused by the revolution in 1917, when the rabble reigned instead of the tsar. Of the 18 pastors sent to Siberia, none was allowed to return to their congregations. The Bolsheviks deported 400 Germans, Latvians (page 210) and Estonians to Siberia as hostages

= = = = = = = = = = = =  Continued in Part 2  = = = = = = = = = = 

      This booklet was reprinted numerous times and, commenting on the 1930 reprint, the journal Archiv für Religionspsychologie / Archive for the Psychology of Religion, Vol. 5 (1930), p. 363, said (translated)
"The booklet describes a memorable period of Baltic church history (1919), based on the strong religious life of the persecution period. It has long since found its way to the people."
Even scholars from this journal of the "psychology of religion" had to admit that Schabert's writings were "memorable" and aided a "strong religious life of the persecution period".  They even had to admit that "the people" had procured such a book, even if their review was only a few short lines.  Surely "the people" did not procure such a book on a recommendation by these scholars.  Fortunately Friedrich Bente provided a much richer book review and quoted Schabert at length.
= = = = =  Table of Contents  = = = = =
Part 1 – This blog post: Introduction, Bente's book review
Part 2 – “Red flag—bloody rule”; Greatest WW I Heroes (conclusion to Bente's review)
Part 3 – Martyrdom of the Baltic Church— "He preached until the bullet closed his mouth"
Part 4 – Schabert's 1930 book of 51 Martyrs’ Portraits: “Take aim, the angels are waiting for me”
Part 5 – Too terrible to think about? Schabert's 1930 Baltic Martyrs' Book
Part 6 – Orthodox or "Orthodox"? Pieper on Schabert misstatement; Lutheran Church not a "denomination"

Sunday, November 22, 2020

Pieper's eulogy– B.B. Warfield: Dogmatics, Inspiration – America's premier Presbyterian theologian

B. B. Warfield
      I have previously blogged about the great Presbyterian theologian B.B. Warfield and his communications with Prof. Franz Pieper.  Recently I came across Pieper's comments on the official memorial address given at Warfield's passing by his successor in 1921.  And we see that Pieper presents the last word on the legacy of Warfield, from the Lutheran teacher of the 20th century.  
      There are at least two surprising items of interest in this writing about Pieper's stress on the importance of teaching Christian doctrine, or Dogmatics. The background for one of these items is that opposing Lutherans in America, especially the Ohio Synod, charged the Missourians with "Calvinism" regarding their doctrine of Election. Whose teaching was Lutheran, and whose was not? Dr. Warfield, a Calvinist, gives the surprisingly definitive answer.   — Then of course we hear again of the ridicule that Warfield endured in his own circles for holding on to the doctrine of the Inspiration of Scripture.  It is a shame that Prof. Mark Noll today practically treats Warfield in the same way.  Today's LC-MS treats Pieper and Walther the same way on their stand on Inspiration, as Warfield's associates treated him in his day.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 
From Lehre und Wehre, vol. 21 (Sept. 1921), p. 284-286; translation by BackToLuther, highlighting is mine. German text here.

[Page 284]

Ecclesiastical-Contemporary History. 

Dr. Francis Landey Patton (Wikipedia)

Too much dogmatics? In the July issue of the Princeton Theological Review, the memorial address of Dr. [Francis Landey] Patton was published that he gave on Dr. [B.B.] Warfield, who died February 16 of this year [1921]. Dr. Warfield had been Professor of Dogmatics at Princeton Theological Seminary since 1887, and Patton said that through Warfield “the department of Systematic Theology has been built up and has attained a position in this Seminary [Princeton] which it never had before.” Of course, Warfield was quite alone in the faculty at last with his adherence to the Inspiration of Scripture and his emphasis on the importance of Christian doctrine, in contrast to the common ideas about the nature of the Christian religion. This led to the reproach of his own community that he placed too much emphasis on the dogmatic education of the students. Dr. Patton addresses this accusation in his memorial address. Patton himself does not share Warfield's point of view, which was already known to us and also appears in the memorial address. But he does say in Warfield's defense (page 285), while at the same time lamenting the lack of interest in doctrine in his church fellowship: 

“You may wonder sometimes how much time should be given to Systematic Theology in the curriculum of the Seminary, and may be disposed to think that it already has in this institution rather more than its share. Let me speak freely here. You may tell the student that when he leaves the theological seminary, he should keep up his Greek and Hebrew, and prosecute a systematic course of study. But you may be sure that very few men will do it. If he has the time to study as we had who graduated fifty-six years ago, the graduate will gratify his literary appetite and consult his own tastes; but he will follow no cut-and-dried plan. If he has a self-directing mind, he will not adopt a program made by somebody else. But we must remember that times have changed in fifty years. The minister of to-day has his hands full of the activities of the church and other activities besides, and in the inevitable division of labor which has come about we have professors with whom the claims of highly specialized learning shut out to a large extent the opportunity for general reading, and pastors whose readings must come in the intervals between crowded hours, and be very general at that. And yet it is theology which must constitute the backbone of a minister’s pulpit-work, and that he may use it in a free, familiar, unconstrained expression of himself, it must by some hidden process of metabolism enter into the tissues of his being and become part of his life. It is when he is in the seminary and bring into the pulpit beautiful bouquets which they have gathered from the garden of poesy. The reason is that in many cases they have lost faith in the Gospel of salvation, and have parted company with the doctrines of redeeming grace. I am addressing myself more particularly at this moment to young men who are about to enter the ministry, and I wish not to be misunderstood. Art, science, literature, philosophy, are yours; all are yours, and ye are Christ’s and Christ is God’s; use them all in the service of the Sanctuary. Pour the red wine of the Gospel into the golden chalice of your choicest workmanship. But remember that no amount of intellectual attainment will profit you if conviction dies.”

Of course, this confident conviction of the saving truth can only be present in the preacher's heart if the preacher is unceasing in his study of Christian doctrine, in other words, if he continues to study unceasingly. Otherwise, in spite of all external activity, he becomes necessarily “stale”. Walther called this “verbauern” [rusticate].

Dr. Franz Pieper
We would like to say a few words about the late Dr. Warfield. Among the American Reformed theologians, Warfield was considered the most thorough expert of German modern theological literature. We may add that he also studied the writings of the Missouri Synod diligently and with great interest. Soon after Dr. Walther's death in 1887, he turned to the undersigned with a request for writings from which he could gain a clear picture of Walther's doctrinal position. We complied with the request, and the result was that the Princeton dogmatist (page 286) requested further submissions, including Synodical reports. A theologian of the General Synod who had visited Princeton published, somewhat indiscreetly, that he had found Dr. Warfield's study table covered with Missourian synodical reports. From this, too, some of our opponents in the dispute over the doctrines of Conversion and Election of Grace believed that they could accept that our doctrine of Election of Grace was identical with the Calvinist doctrine.  The fact is that Dr. Warfield recognized the difference between our doctrine and Calvin's teaching. Nor did he share our position in the doctrine of eternal election. He believed, like his predecessors Charles and A. A. Hodge, that the Election of Grace must be combined with an Election of Wrath. On the other hand, Warfield argued that the doctrine of the Missouri Synod, in contrast to other American Lutheran synods, was the doctrine of the Formula of Concord, which, like the Missouri Synod, teaches an Election of Grace but firmly rejects an Election of Wrath. Warfield has been accused of being “scientifically” backward because of his commitment to the inspiration of Holy Scriptures from within his own fellowship. They even allowed themselves to transfer him to “Borneo” with his view of the Holy Scriptures. It was a consolation to him, as he announced in letters and occasionally in publications, that a great Lutheran synod of America, whose ministry’s “scholarly character cannot be denied”, unanimously and without clauses, professed to be inspired by Scripture. F. P. [Franz Pieper]

[ref. Christian Dogmatics I, 272, Christliche Dogmatik I, 327-328]

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
      We see just how much Dr. Warfield, a Presbyterian Calvinist to the end, read from the Missourians!  It was surely embarrassing for the opposing American Lutherans to read that Warfield's study table was "covered with Missourian synodical reports".  I think I will follow Warfield in this, even if today's LC-MS scarcely does.
B.B. Warfield – studied the Missouri Synod & held to the  Inspiration of Holy Scripture