BWC1e: Pieper→Baier-Walther cross-reference (#1), updated

      This continues from Part BWC1d in a series (Table of Contents in Part BWC1) presenting Walther's edition of Baier's Compendium of Positive Theology. — The following cross-reference was presented in 2017 before all the updates became available where one could link directly to English translations of the sources. Now all links have been updated to their English sources and have been compiled in the following tables. This allows fast access for rigorous study of various topics as covered by Pieper and Walther (and Baier). — Rather than a scrollable embedded window, I am presenting the table in the blog itself so that it may be archived as a unit. What follows is the listing for Volume 1 with over 300 links (pink shaded links will be updated when the translation of Volume 3 of Baier-Walther is completed):

Christliche Dogmatik v:ppp:xxxxx	Christian Dogmatics ppp;nnnn	Baier- Walther Compendium	Notes
1:006n12	8n8	1:014	Calov’s detailed account of various derivations of the Latin religio
1:044n164	42	1:002	Baier: Theology  – Greek word composite of God and Word.
1:051n181	47	1:069	Baier: Theology is a supernatural aptitude
1:056n202	52n80	1:043, 076	Pfeiffer: no doctrine outside of those based on Scripture
1:064n225	58n87	1:005	true nature of theology, is based on Scripture
1:091n319	81	3:245 f.	Dogmaticians call doctrine of justification the fundamental article.
1:095n346	85	1:061 note e [sic?]	"fundamental doctrines" did not originate with the Church
1:099n361	88n122	1:062	not every false doctrine which by its nature is destructive of the foundation of faith … "felicitous inconsistency" (“glückliche Inkonsequenz”)
1:103n376	92	1:065	Baier: errors on non-fundamental articles  – be “on our guard lest by embracing and teaching error we rashly sin”
1:106n387	94n135	1:067 nota c	Open question: Is the soul of each individual created by God immediately (creationism) or mediately through the parents (traducianism)?
1:107n390	95n137	1:067  1767 ed.: p 52	Open questions: “... the many questions which Scripture leaves unanswered”
1:117n422	104	1:040	The subject of the operation of theology is homo peccator (the sinner) in so far as he is to be led to eternal salvation
1:158n545	138n190	1:076	Does theology constitute a system?
1:173n570	150n200	1:076	Baier prefers “analytic method” over synthetic” method of theology
1:173n572	150n201	1:029	Analytical method, however, proceeds from effect to cause or seeks to derive the whole from a particular part
1:175n583	151n204	—	Baier is infected with the synergistic bias of his father-in-law Musaeus.  The edition of Walther, St. Louis, 1879, is not a mere reprint of Baier's compend, but by the addition of quotations has been expanded to three volumes - - - - - - -  In the cited quotations, not only Luther and the old theologians, but also the modern theologians of the 19th century, are abundantly cited, so that students are offered a source material which enables them to judge both the old and modern theology.  Prof. Th. Bünger has supplied a index of subject and names on this edition of Walther’s, which has been worked with great diligence and great expertise.
1:176	152	—	Baier discusses the last things: death, resurrection, the Judgment, and the destruction of the world immediately in connection with salvation
1:176n585	152n205	1:077	The all-important point is that the theologian observe the principle of divine revelation, not the “faith” of the theologian (Objective!)

The balance for Volume 1 is available after the jump break (Volumes 2 and 3 will come later, see below):

Christliche Dogmatik v:ppp:xxxxx	Christian Dogmatics ppp;nnnn	Baier- Walther Compendium	Notes
1:194	166n227	—	General intro to Baier-Walther, defense against misunderstandings - “The dogmatic works of the 17th century, …  rather do we observe in them already a pollution of the stream that gushed forth in crystal purity in the sixteenth century”
1:211	174	1:069	Luther: “A doctor of the Holy Scriptures no one can make for you but alone the Holy Ghost from heaven”
1:234n673	193n2, 194n2	1:106, 105	"But after God had chosen to transmit His Word in writing, the Church of every age was strictly bound to the written Word of God"
1:245n713	203n10	1:087	Consensus of Church not equal to Holy Scripture
1:249n721	206n18	1:081	Roman pontiff, when he speaks ex cathedra, … infallibility… unalterable.
1:271n776	225	1:099	“Inspiration itself, … , implies the impulse of executing the act of writing”
1:275n787	228n40	1:102	R.F. Grau: “The boundaries between the divine and the human in Scripture cannot be determined mechanically and quantitatively”
1:280n801	233n42	1:101 f.	Arguments against the inspiration of Holy Scripture: (1) different style in the various books in the Scripture
1:285n810	236n45	1:102	(2) The appeal of the holy writers to their historical research
1:297n834	247n53	1:102 f.	(4) alleged contradictions in Scripture and erroneous statements  – Kahnis: “all the inaccurate quotations” from the Old Testament found in the New.
1:308n850	255n58	1:102 f.	Kahnis: “solecisms and barbarisms of the Apostolic Scriptures, all faulty constructions of Paul”
1:315n870	261	1:102	The brief personal letter to Philemon has also been used as an argument against the inspiration of Scripture
1:321n891	266n77	— Baier’s 1690 ed.	The Church Fathers, too, taught the Verbal Inspiration
1:325	270	1:103	Kahnis: “Among these Prophetic and Apostolic writings we find differences, from the viewpoint of both origin and content”
1:342n953	283n94	1:102	Against the inspiration of Scripture Kahnis also advances this fact, that the Evangelists do not use the identical words in their report of the institution of the Lord's Supper.
1:367n1018	304n102	1:103	Kahnis: “This principle [of Scripture’s sole authority] is independent of the dogmaticians' doctrine of inspiration”
1:372n1036	307	1:119	This divine authority of Scripture (Christian certainty, or fides divina) is absolute  – “worthy of credence on its own account”
1:374n1041	310	1:121	Fides humana, or ‘scientific certainty’, of the divine authority of Scripture.
1:375n1043	310n106	1:130 f.	Comparing the Holy Scriptures according to content and style with other "Bibles" in the world, e.g. the Koran.
1:375n1044	310n107	1:129	Christiantity “is an offense to the Jews and foolishness to the Greeks”
1:375n1047	310n110	1:121-131	Apologetics / fides humana: “more reasonable to grant the divinity of Scripture than to deny it”
1:378n1055	313n113	1:136	The Holy Ghost …  testifies externally in the written Word and within the heart by working faith in the written Word that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures
1:387n1078	320n122	1:176	Unitarian  – the writings of St. John have been singled out as being particularly obscure
1:392n1094	324	1:168	Augustine: “For hardly anything is derived from those obscure passages but what is stated elsewhere most clearly."
1:393n1099	326n129	1:169 ff.	External clarity of Scripture “is also the unanimous teaching of the dogmaticians”
1:399n1118	330n133	1:149	Neither the Jewish Church nor Christ recognized Apochrypha as canonical
1:399n1119	330n134	1:150 note b	Eusebius in his Church History lists the homologoumena and the antilegomena.
Christliche Dogmatik v:ppp:xxxxx	Christian Dogmatics ppp;nnnn	Baier- Walther Compendium	Notes
1:406n1124	336	1:153	A. Osiander, A. Hunnius, etc. agree with Chemnitz on canon of Scripture
1:406n1126	336n138	1:150, 153
1:406n1127	336n139	1:153	Gerhard’s weakness in speaking of second rank in canon of doctrine of Scripture.
1:423n1161	351	1:186	Baier: Men “cannot contradict [Scripture’s plain meaning] except against the protest of their conscience
1:425n1163	353n156	1:188 f.	Gerhard quote on authority of Scripture against Pope.
1:433n1172	358n162	1:139 ff.	The Symbols are a …  derived norm, because the doctrines confessed in our Symbols are taken from Scripture.
1:433n1174	358	1:140 f.	The Symbols should not be called "inspired”.
1:446n1201	372n4	1:026 ff.	Heathen attempt to propitiate God by idol worship, sacrifices, asceticism, etc., and thus to silence their accusing consciences.
1:458n1223	381n11	1:131	Mohammedans / Koran:  “Believe in God and in His messenger [Jesus], but say nothing of the Triad”
1:462n1232	384n17	2:053 ff.	Kahnis, [Subordinationist] speaks of the Son and the Holy Ghost as "God in the second and third sense of the word."
1:501n1314	409n47	2:057	Doctrine of Trinity, term of “person”
1:504n1321	415n50	2:069	The Filioque became one of the points which caused the schism between the Eastern and the Western Churches … Augustine taught it
1:506n1323	417n53	2:064	Athanasian Creed (see BookOfConcord, Trigl. 31 ff
1:509n1329	419	2:069	Distinction between the Son's generation and the Spirit's procession
1:525n1347	429	2:011	“our finite and imperfect reason cannot comprehend the infinite perfection of God”
1:527n1350	429n59	2:011	“Divine essence”  –
1:534n1359	435n67	2:016	Positive attributes, such as life, knowledge, wisdom, holiness, righteousness, truth, power, love, goodness, grace, merey
1:537n1366	438	2:014	No carefully worded definition of God.
1:539n1370	439n73	2:018, 019	The dream of modern theosophists of a spiritual body which was solidified in and by the creation of the world
1:546n1382	445	2:024 ff.	Special presence of God?  – No
Christliche Dogmatik v:ppp:xxxxx	Christian Dogmatics ppp;nnnn	Baier- Walther Compendium	Notes
1:566n1430	460n101	2:044	Gerhard: “God is really good, He alone is good, and He is the cause of all goodness”
1:571n1439	468n2	2:098	heathen pantheism, heathen dualism
1:571n1440	468n3	2:097 f.	Only he knows God who knows that He created the world from nothing
1:572n1441	469n4	2:079	Hexaemeron - 6-Day Creation: forces us to accept the days as days of twenty-four hours  – Luther over Augustine
1:574n1447	471n6	2:083	“Restitution theory” (or “Gap Theory”) of creation.
1:575n1450	471n8	2:084	According to the clear statement of Scripture there was light before sun, moon, and stars existed.
1:579n1457	475n13	2:087-88	6th Day  – Before Fall, no decay, animals not against Man, no poisonous plants.
1:582n1462	477n17	2:091 f.	Older Lutheran dogmaticians teach dichotomy of body and soul.
1:582n1463	477n18	2:093	There were no pre-Adamites
1:585n1471	479	2:096	The creatures were good because they were exactly as God desired them to be
1:586n1474	480n26	2:095	Creation the work of Trine God, not divided among Persons.
1:587n1476	480n27	2:096	Nor had there been any prevenient cause of creation accept solely the pleasure of God
1:591n1483	486n4	2:164 - 165 (pg # not cited  in Pieper)	divine providence extends even to the minutest creatures (Page in Baier not mentioned in CDk or CD)
1:595n1491	489n6	2:169	The so-called “laws of nature” are not something which differs from God's will and operation
1:598n1495	492n8	2:176	“According to the law of divine providence, which rules all things, it is correctly said that all things happen of necessity; from the standpoint of man everything in human affairs is done freely and contingency." ”
1:604n1508	500n6	2:108 f.	Angels clothed with some kind of ethereal body, a refined material fabric and the like, has no basis in Scripture
1:604n1509	500n7	2:109	Angels with assumed bodies really did eat
1:605n1509	501n7	2:113	Angels with assumed bodies
1:606n1511	501	2:111	The angels do not know all things
1:609n1515	503n10	2:117	"The immaterial soul fills no space, and still we can say where it is"
1:612n1521	506n14	2:163 f.	Hofmann has the notion that God needs the angels "to make Himself present to His world”.
1:613n1524	507n16	2:128	We should rejoice and take comfort in their service and carefuly avoid grieving angels.
1:615n1530	510n20	2:136 ff.
1:617n1534	515	2:143	Gen. 1:26-27: “Image” and “likeness” are synonyms
1:621n1544	519	2:146	Luther: “man as the noble creature who once bore the image of God and in whom God would recreate this image through faith in Christ”
1:626n1552	524n11	2:158	Baier's opinion that Eve had less knowledge of nature than Adam cannot be substantiated from Scripture
1:633n1564	529n16	2:275	Modern theology: nothing is sin, unless it be voluntary
1:636n1567	532n17	2:269	Heathen “show the work of the law written in their hearts…”
1:637n1570	—	3:351 ff.	On Sunday
1:637n1570	—	3:358-366	Usury (Wucher): Lehre und Wehre, Chemnitz, Luther
1:641n1572	534n20	2:274	God punishes sins with sins, yet the cause of sin is the will of the wicked, that is, of the devil and ungodly men
1:646n1580	538n23	2:291 f.	Original guilt … even some modern Lutherans insist that only that can he charged against man as a transgression which he has himself committed
1:648n1586	540n27	2:290	We may not and dare not measure the justice of God with a human yardstick.
1:649n1593	541	2:281	hereditary corruption  – only known by Holy Scripture
1:659n1609	550n35  – ref. omitted but quote given	2:294	Not Scripture, but the decretal of Pius IX, 1854, took Mary, in the interest of Mariolatry, out of the category of sinners and ascribed to her an immaculate conception
1:660n1610	550	2:295	hereditary corruption  – resides primarily in the soul, also body
1:662n1613	552n37	2:305	Why the eating of the forbidden fruit brought death to Adam and Eve  – by creating, first and foremost, doubt of God's Word
1:665n1616	554n39	2:305 f.	"This pestilence forms a part of the original corruption, which clings to us throughout our life on earth"
1:668n1626	557n42	2:300 ff.	The reasons which lead men to assert the freedom of will in spiritual matters - self-righteousness and self-conceit
1:674n1638	562n48	2:313 ff.	The truth of the Gospel is at stake when the weak brother insists that his error be acknowledged as the true doctrine.
1:677n1650	566n52	2:269	Erring conscience creates double jeopardy  – sinning if he does and sinning if he doesn’t
1:680n1659	568 Omitted ref.	2:324	“A secretly harbored implacability may be a more grievous sin than a word or deed prompted by a sudden burst of passion”
1:680n1661	568n58	2:325 ff.	Arminians hold essentially the same view as the Catholics on “venial sins” deserving only temporal punishment.
1:682n1666	570n62	2:322	Chemnitz on partaking of sins of others

The next listing, for Volume 2, will come in Part BWC2i after the translation of Volume 3 is completed.