To follow-up Friedrich Bente's wonderful essay on the "Fathers" of the old (German) Missouri Synod, I am now going to publish 2 pamphlets on the subject of "Prayer Fellowship", both in English. These were published a little more than 20 years after Bente's essay and show the great divide that happened in the intervening years that were marked by 2 overarching events:
- the death of Franz Pieper in 1931 and
- the denial of the true doctrine of Justification by Theodore Graebner in 1939
- Graebner-Prayer Fellowship.PDF (PDF scan, 1.2MB) [now on Archive]
- Graebner-Prayer Fellowship.DOC (Doc file - OCR, 82KB) [updated]
Theodore Graebner was especially dangerous because he could speak the Lutheran "lingo"... he had worked "shoulder-to-shoulder" with Franz Pieper and Friedrich Bente. He knew enough truth so that he could mix his errors with it and so deceive the people of the LC-MS.
But this blog post is not about Graebner's errors, it is rather about the masterful refutation by Prof. Walter W.F. Albrecht who was one of the early translators of Franz Pieper's Christliche Dogmatik into the English Christian Dogmatics. He was a professor at Springfield, Illinois, not St. Louis, and apparently staved off the horrible effects of Graebner for a period of time and allowed Concordia Theological Seminary to hold fast the faithful Word longer. A writer for Concordia Historical Institute Quarterly (CHIQ, vol. 77-78, page 250) said in 2004 that Albrecht was
...a bit of an enigma. He tended to be caustic and hypercritical with a little of the rebel in him. On the other hand, he could be friendly...
The reason that Albrecht was called "caustic" and "hypercritical" is because he was a faithful servant of God's Word among the errorists and so is called "caustic, hypercritical" by them when attacking false doctrine. And who were the "rebels" in truth?... the errorists! The faithful teachers such as Albrecht were defending against the true rebels... rebels against God's Word. The Prophets and Apostles bear witness of this. And Martin Luther thundered against errorists while under constant attack from them.
And so I now present Albrecht's response to Theodore Graebner's teaching on "Prayer Fellowship, scanned PDF and OCR'd DOC file. This is a truly Scriptural work – a faithful following of the pure teaching of Walther and Pieper. [2018-11-19: now available on Archive.org]
- Dr. Theo. Graebner's "Prayer Fellowship" in the Lightof Scripture and the Faith of Our Fathers.PDF (1.3 MB) [Archive]
- Dr. Theo. Graebner's "Prayer Fellowship" in the Lightof Scripture and the Faith of Our Fathers.DOC (74 KB) [updated]
Albrecht also defends against the false teachings of The Statement of the Forty-Four (or "Statement of the 44"). There is some doctrinal information on the "Statement" on the Internet:
- WELS has 2 essays: Paul Naumann 1979 here, Curtis Jahn 1981 here [updated links]
- Daniel Preus gives some background here [link updated to Archive copy]
- CLC has an essay here [updated link]
--------------------- Introduction ------------------------
DR. THEO. GRAEBNER'S
"PRAYER FELLOWSHIP" IN THE LIGHT OF
SCRIPTURE AND THE FAITH OF OUR FATHERS
"PRAYER FELLOWSHIP" IN THE LIGHT OF
SCRIPTURE AND THE FAITH OF OUR FATHERS
by Walter W.F. Albrecht
A
pamphlet with the title "PrayerFellowship by Th. Graebner" and coming from the presses of Concordia
Publishing House has come to my desk. On the first page it bears the note:
"Published by resolution of the Conference of Visitors and Delegates of
the Western District of the Ev. Luth. Synod of Missouri, Ohio, and Other
States, meeting at St. Louis, September 25, 1945." And at its very end we
find as third resolution adopted by the conference: "That we ask
Concordia Publishing House to publish the paper on prayer fellowship by Prof.
Graebner in order to make it available to other conferences." But with
this the official "Minutes of the Meeting of Visitors and Representatives
of Circuits of the Western District, held at Holy Cross Hall, St. Louis,
Missouri, September 25, 1945" do not seem to agree. There we read: "A
motion was made and seconded that Dr. Graebner be asked to make his paper
available to all brethren. The motion was carried.... A vote of thanks to Dr.
Graebner for preparing and delivering his paper, for leading the discussion,
and consenting to make his paper available. It was moved that the District pay
the expense of sending the paper to Visitors and official delegates of the
circuits." From this it appears that neither was the essay adopted, nor
was Concordia Publishing House requested to publish it.
In
considering the body of the essay we use the sectional headings used by the
author to enable the reader quickly to refer to the proper page of the work
discussed.
The
question declared to be "basic to the current discussion of prayer
fellowship" (p 3), namely "joint prayer with the representatives of
the A.L.C.,"
diverts the attention of the reader from the fact that all salient features of
the Statementof the Forty-Four are being defended in this brochure. Our Synod is divided
on the question of opening and closing intersynodical conferences with prayer.
We have let local conditions and sentiment decide in each case, have held each
instance to be a case of casuistry, following the faculty opinion of 1941. Now
to tell us that common prayer at intersynodical conferences is the basic issue
the Statement of the
Forty-Four is striving to clarify, is nothing less than a hiding of the true issue,
unionism.
-------------------- End of Part 1 - Introduction ------------------------
The next Part 2 will be Albrecht's rebuttal to Graebner's points (1) Proof Texts, (2) Relation to Erring Christians, and (3) Prayer Not Confessional Act.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments only accepted when directly related to the post.