Who are the Pfaffen?
[by C. F. W. Walther; Part 10]
Before we now close this article, two more remarks!
As important as it is that a Christian does not take a Pfaffen for a true servant of Christ, follow him, and thus become a Pfaffen servant; it is equally important that a Christian does not, on the contrary, take a faithful servant of Christ for a Pfaffen, be ashamed of him and reproach him with the world, and thus become a persecutor of faithful servants of God. False Christians are usually quick to call a pastor a Pfaffen when he tells them the unvarnished and therefore often very bitter truth, and that they already call that a pfaffish domineering nature when a conscientious preacher does not want to deviate from God's Word even one letter. But such false Christians should know that it is a terrible sin to call a preacher a Pfaffen because he sticks unbendingly to God's Word and punishes all false doctrine and all ungodly nature without asking for the favor of men.
Whoever gives a servant of Christ the title of a Pfaffen for this reason should know that he is not only insulting and blaspheming a Christian man [not woman], but the Son of God Himself, and that he will learn on that terrible day what an abominable sin he has thereby loaded on his conscience; for Christ says of all pure teachers: “He that heareth you heareth me; and he that despiseth you despiseth me; and he that despiseth me despiseth him that sent me.” Luke 10:16. Unfortunately, this has happened at all times even in the orthodox church. When the faithful Lutheran preachers in Nuremberg in 1541 had to severely punish the ungodly nature, especially the avarice, which was spreading among the “Lutheran” citizens, they also had to learn that their own Lutheran parishioners called them “Pfaffen”. The godly Wenceslaus Link complained about this to Luther in a letter, to which Luther replied, among other things, as follows:
“I have often wondered why John the Baptist and Christ himself were not killed for the sake of the first table, but for the sake of the second, namely, because the former had punished the incest (of Herod), but the latter the avarice (of the Pharisees), while the apostles and later the martyrs were killed for the sake of the first table; perhaps we also will suffer not for the first table, which they will confess with us, but for the second, for which they do not want to be punished. But be thou strong, and persevere against those words, ‘Pfaff’ and the like. For thus [page 52-3] speak those who regard our words as the words of men, by which they testify that they respect neither the first nor the second table. But it will be very shameful for Nuremberg, if it comes out by word and in writing, that they consider the Gospel, which they have confessed, to be the word of men, since we have swept out all the word of men in such hot battles. If they do not consider it to be God's Word, it is all the more shameful that they set out to remove the ban which is God's Word, to despise and hate the ministers of God's Word, and to blaspheme God, whom they have confessed, in His ministers so nefariously as ‘Pfaffen’.” *)
––––––––––
* See: Luther's Previously Unpublished Letters, provided by Dr. G. Schütze. Leipzig, 1780. vol. I, p. 165. F. [StL 21, 2646]